* largely defined by its supertype.
 *
 * <p>For field types and method return types, you should generally use the immutable type (such as
 * {@link ImmutableList}) instead of the general collection interface type (such as {@link List}).
 * This communicates to your callers all of the semantic guarantees listed above, which is almost
 * always very useful information.
 *

       *
       * And, no, defining (final or not) local variables out of the loop still isn't as good
       * because the null check on the theUnsafe object remains inside the loop and
       * BYTE_ARRAY_BASE_OFFSET doesn't get constant-folded.
       *
       * The compiler can treat static final fields as compile-time constants and can constant-fold

	Key            *ObjectKey `parser:"  @@"`               // ['name'] and .name forms
	Index          *int       `parser:"| \"[\" @Int \"]\""` // [3] form
	ObjectWildcard bool       `parser:"| @\".*\""`          // .* form
	ArrayWildcard  bool       `parser:"| @\"[*]\""`         // [*] form
}

// JSONPath represents a keypath.
// Instances should be treated idempotent and not change once created.
type JSONPath struct {

	ROTR	$12, R8		// 00284302
	ROTRV	$63, R22	// 0036b7fe


//	LAND/LXOR/LNOR/LOR rreg ',' rreg
//	{
//		outcode(int($1), &$2, 0, &$4);
//	}
	AND	R14, R8		// 010e4024
	XOR	R15, R9		// 012f4826
	NOR	R16, R10	// 01505027
	OR	R17, R11	// 01715825

//	LAND/LXOR/LOR imm ',' rreg
//	{
//		outcode(int($1), &$2, 0, &$4);
//	}
	AND	$11, R17, R7	// 3227000b
	XOR	$341, R1, R23	// 38370155

   * String.class}, then {@code new TypeResolver().where(formal, actual)} will {@linkplain
   * #resolveType resolve} {@code ParameterizedType List<T>} to {@code List<String>}, and resolve
   * {@code Map<T, Something>} to {@code Map<String, Something>} etc. Similarly, {@code formal} and
   * {@code actual} can be {@code Map<K, V>} and {@code Map<String, Integer>} respectively, or they

case, it could be better to have only 2 servers and use a higher percentage of their resources (CPU, memory, disk, network bandwidth, etc).

On the other hand, if you have 2 servers and you are using **100% of their CPU and RAM**, at some point one process will ask for more memory, and the server will have to use the disk as "memory" (which can be thousands of times slower), or even **crash**. Or one process might need to do some computation and would have to wait until the CPU is free again....

 * largely defined by its supertype.
 *
 * <p>For field types and method return types, you should generally use the immutable type (such as
 * {@link ImmutableList}) instead of the general collection interface type (such as {@link List}).
 * This communicates to your callers all of the semantic guarantees listed above, which is almost
 * always very useful information.
 *

plain period and slash.
Within an assembler source file, the symbols above are written as
<code>fmt·Printf</code> and <code>math∕rand·Int</code>.
The assembly listings generated by the compilers when using the <code>-S</code> flag
show the period and slash directly instead of the Unicode replacements
required by the assemblers.
</p>

<p>
Most hand-written assembly files do not include the full package path

As the parameters are described with TypeScript types (similar to Python type hints), editor support is quite good.

<p>
these types are identical:
</p>

<pre>
A0, A1, and []string
A2 and struct{ a, b int }
A3 and int
A4, func(int, float64) *[]string, and A5

B0 and C0
[]int and []int
struct{ a, b *T5 } and struct{ a, b *T5 }
func(x int, y float64) *[]string, func(int, float64) (result *[]string), and A5
</pre>

<p>
<code>B0</code> and <code>B1</code> are different because they are new types