verifyScenario(alteration.mutate(scenario), level + 1);
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * An aggregation of an ordering with a list (of size > 1) that should prove to be in strictly
   * increasing order according to that ordering.
   */
  private static class Scenario<T extends @Nullable Object> {
    final Ordering<T> ordering;
    final List<T> strictlyOrderedList;

        verifyScenario(alteration.mutate(scenario), level + 1);
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * An aggregation of an ordering with a list (of size > 1) that should prove to be in strictly
   * increasing order according to that ordering.
   */
  private static class Scenario<T extends @Nullable Object> {
    final Ordering<T> ordering;
    final List<T> strictlyOrderedList;

    assertEquals("bar", Iterables.getLast(iterable, "qux"));
  }

  /**
   * {@link ArrayList} extension that forbids the use of {@link Collection#iterator} for tests that
   * need to prove that it isn't called.
   */
  private static class DiesOnIteratorArrayList extends ArrayList<String> {
    /** @throws UnsupportedOperationException all the time */
    @Override
    public Iterator<String> iterator() {

    assertEquals("bar", Iterables.getLast(iterable, "qux"));
  }

  /**
   * {@link ArrayList} extension that forbids the use of {@link Collection#iterator} for tests that
   * need to prove that it isn't called.
   */
  private static class DiesOnIteratorArrayList extends ArrayList<String> {
    /** @throws UnsupportedOperationException all the time */
    @Override
    public Iterator<String> iterator() {

    }
  }

  /*
   * Preconditions.checkNotNull is *intended* for performing eager null checks on parameters that a
   * nullness checker can already "prove" are non-null. That means that the first parameter to
   * checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past

        return true;
      }
    }
    throw new AssertionError();
  }

  /*
   * If n <= millerRabinBases[i][0], then testing n against bases millerRabinBases[i][1..] suffices
   * to prove its primality. Values from miller-rabin.appspot.com.
   *
   * NOTE: We could get slightly better bases that would be treated as unsigned, but benchmarks
   * showed negligible performance improvements.
   */

    }
  }

  /*
   * Preconditions.checkNotNull is *intended* for performing eager null checks on parameters that a
   * nullness checker can already "prove" are non-null. That means that the first parameter to
   * checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past

	}

	// The Reader should have buffered all the content from the io.Reader.
	if n := len(eofR.buf); n != 0 {
		t.Fatalf("got %d bytes left in bufio.Reader source; want 0 bytes", n)
	}
	// To prove the point, check that there are still 5 bytes available to read.
	if n := r.Buffered(); n != 5 {
		t.Fatalf("got %d bytes buffered in bufio.Reader; want 5 bytes", n)
	}

	// This is the second read of 0 bytes.

    public int hashCode() {
      // Warning: this is broken if size() == 0, so it is critical that we
      // substitute an empty ImmutableSet to the user in place of this

      // It's a weird formula, but tests prove it works.
      int adjust = size() - 1;
      for (int i = 0; i < axes.size(); i++) {
        adjust *= 31;
        adjust = ~~adjust;
        // in GWT, we have to deal with integer overflow carefully
      }

*  particular purpose or non-infringing. The entire risk as to the     *
*  quality and performance of the Covered Software is with You.        *
*  Should any Covered Software prove defective in any respect, You     *
*  (not any Contributor) assume the cost of any necessary servicing,   *
*  repair, or correction. This disclaimer of warranty constitutes an   *