Object key = node.getKey();

        // TODO Does this check need to happen here? Had to add the same call
        // below when we iterate on child nodes -- will that suffice?
        if (managedVersions.containsKey(key)) {
            manageArtifact(node, managedVersions, listeners);
        }

        List<ResolutionNode> previousNodes = resolvedArtifacts.get(key);

    filesystem, it will continue to be available.

  The question remaining is: Which level of offline mode will we support? It
  seems reasonable to assume that users will be able to tell when localhost is
  not active (in most cases, localhost should be available, even if the rest of
  the network is not). Therefore, let's concentrate on the state where no
  network <beyond localhost> exists, and leave the more extreme state to users

want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so
that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original
authors' reputations.

Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents.
We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will
individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program

            if (request.isResolveRoot()) {
                result.addArtifact(rootArtifact);
            }
            return result;
        }

        // After the collection we will have the artifact object in the result but they will not be resolved yet.
        result = artifactCollector.collect(
                artifacts, rootArtifact, managedVersions, collectionRequest, source, collectionFilter, listeners, null);

        //
        // Note that participants may affect the topological order of the projects but it is
        // not expected that a participant will add or remove projects from the session.
        //

        graphResult = buildGraph(session);

        if (graphResult.hasErrors()) {
            return addExceptionToResult(

        return !((version == null || version.isEmpty()) || version.startsWith("[") || version.startsWith("("));
    }

    // TODO !![jc; 28-jul-2005] check this; if we're using '-r' and there are aggregator tasks, this will result in
    // weirdness.
    public MavenProject getTopLevelProject() {
        return sortedProjects.stream()
                .filter(MavenProject::isExecutionRoot)
                .findFirst()

        // Set up needed mocks
        when(session.getRequest()).thenReturn(mavenExecutionRequest);
        when(session.getProjects()).thenReturn(null); // needed, otherwise it will be an empty list by default
        when(mavenExecutionRequest.getProjectBuildingRequest()).thenReturn(mock(ProjectBuildingRequest.class));
        List<ProjectBuildingResult> projectBuildingResults =

    /**
     * Serialize the inbound Model instance to a StringWriter, perform the regex replacement to resolve
     * POM expressions, then re-parse into the resolved Model instance.
     * <p>
     * <b>NOTE:</b> This will result in a different instance of Model being returned!!!
     *
     * @param model The inbound Model instance, to serialize and reference for expression resolution

     * <pre>java -jar ${maven.repo.local}/org/apache/maven/maven-artifact/${maven.version}/maven-artifact-${maven.version}.jar "1.2.7" "1.2-SNAPSHOT"</pre>
     * command to command line. Result of given command will be something like this:
     * <pre>
     * Display parameters as parsed by Maven (in canonical form) and comparison result:
     * 1. 1.2.7 == 1.2.7
     *    1.2.7 &gt; 1.2-SNAPSHOT

        <plugin>
          <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
          <artifactId>maven-release-plugin</artifactId>
          <version>2.0-beta-4</version>
          <configuration>
            <!-- This element will be overridden by children -->
            <tagBase>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/pom/tags</tagBase>
            <useReleaseProfile>false</useReleaseProfile>
            <goals>deploy</goals>