throws IllegalAccessException {
    for (Field field : relevantFields(clazz)) {
      assertEquals(
          upperToHttpHeaderName(field.getName(), specialCases, uppercaseAcronyms), field.get(null));
    }
  }

  // Visible for other tests to use
  static ImmutableSet<Field> relevantFields(Class<?> cls) {
    ImmutableSet.Builder<Field> builder = ImmutableSet.builder();
    for (Field field : cls.getDeclaredFields()) {
      /*

      throws IllegalAccessException {
    for (Field field : relevantFields(clazz)) {
      assertEquals(
          upperToHttpHeaderName(field.getName(), specialCases, uppercaseAcronyms), field.get(null));
    }
  }

  // Visible for other tests to use
  static ImmutableSet<Field> relevantFields(Class<?> cls) {
    ImmutableSet.Builder<Field> builder = ImmutableSet.builder();
    for (Field field : cls.getDeclaredFields()) {
      /*

   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use
   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields
   * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
   *
   * Note that sometimes these fields *do* have correct values under J2CL: They will if the caller

/**
 * @author shinsuke
 */
public class AdminSearchlogAction extends FessAdminAction {

    public static final String ROLE = "admin-searchlog";

    private static final String[] CONDITION_FIELDS =
            { "logType", "queryId", "userSessionId", "accessType", "requestedTimeRange", "pageSize" };

    // ===================================================================================

      <version>1.0.0+</version>
      <fields>
        <field>
          <name>toolchains</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>
          <description>The toolchain instance definition.</description>
          <association xml.itemsStyle="flat">
            <type>ToolchainModel</type>
            <multiplicity>*</multiplicity>
          </association>
        </field>
      </fields>
    </class>
    <class>

      <name>ExtensionDescriptor</name>
      <version>1.0.0</version>
      <description><![CDATA[Root element of the <code>extension.xml</code> file.]]></description>
      <fields>
        <field>
          <name>exportedPackages</name>
          <version>1.0.0</version>
          <association>
            <type>String</type>
            <multiplicity>*</multiplicity>
          </association>

				}
			}

			for _, name := range []string{f.DBName, f.Name} {
				if name != "" {
					if field := s.LookUpField(name); field == nil || (field.Name != name && field.DBName != name) {
						t.Errorf("schema %v failed to look up field with dbname %v", s, f.DBName)
					}
				}
			}

			if f.PrimaryKey {
				var found bool

      <description>A plugin parameter expression supported by Maven</description>
      <fields>
        <field>
          <version>1.0.0</version>
          <name>syntax</name>
          <description>The syntax of the expression</description>
          <type>String</type>
          <required>true</required>
        </field>
        <field>
          <version>1.0.0</version>
          <name>description</name>

   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use
   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields
   * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
   *
   * Note that sometimes these fields *do* have correct values under J2CL: They will if the caller

    extends AggregateFuture<V, C> {
  /*
   * We access this field racily but safely. For discussion of a similar situation, see the comments
   * on the fields of TimeoutFuture. This field is slightly different from the fields discussed
   * there: cancel() never reads this field, only writes to it. That makes the race here completely
   * harmless, rather than just 99.99% harmless.
   */