unused.cancel(false);
    future = null;

    // Future should be collected because whenAll*Complete* doesn't need to look at its result.
    GcFinalization.awaitClear(futureRef);
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible
  public void testWhenAllSucceed_releasesCallable() throws Exception {

                  }
                }
              }));
    }

    @VisibleForTesting
    void addShutdownHook(Thread hook) {
      Runtime.getRuntime().addShutdownHook(hook);
    }
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // TODO
  private static void useDaemonThreadFactory(ThreadPoolExecutor executor) {
    executor.setThreadFactory(

 *
 * <pre>
 * interface Book {...}
 * public class Books {
 *   public static Book hardcover(String title) {...}
 *   public static Book paperback(String title) {...}
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>And all the created {@code Book} instances can be tested with:
 *
 * <pre>
 * new ClassSanityTester()
 *     .forAllPublicStaticMethods(Books.class)
 *     .thatReturn(Book.class)

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might suggest to users that the test is suppressed

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return Objects.hashCode(map, defaultValue);
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      // TODO(cpovirk): maybe remove "defaultValue=" to make this look like the method call does
      return "Functions.forMap(" + map + ", defaultValue=" + defaultValue + ")";
    }

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 0;
  }

  /**

    if (localInputFuture != null) {
      String message = "inputFuture=[" + localInputFuture + "]";
      if (localTimer != null) {
        long delay = localTimer.getDelay(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
        // Negative delays look confusing in an error message
        if (delay > 0) {
          message += ", remaining delay=[" + delay + " ms]";
        }
      }
      return message;
    }
    return null;
  }

  @Override

    return Helpers.mapEntry(key, value);
  }

  @Override
  protected void expectContents(Collection<Entry<K, V>> expected) {
    // TODO: move this to invariant checks once the appropriate hook exists?
    super.expectContents(expected);
    for (Entry<K, V> entry : expected) {
      assertEquals(
          "Wrong value for key " + entry.getKey(), entry.getValue(), getMap().get(entry.getKey()));
    }
  }

import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * A mapping from disjoint nonempty ranges to non-null values. Queries look up the value associated
 * with the range (if any) that contains a specified key.
 *
 * <p>In contrast to {@link RangeSet}, no "coalescing" is done of {@linkplain

    // Corner case: List is empty.
    if (futures.isEmpty()) {
      handleAllCompleted();
      return;
    }

    // NOTE: If we ever want to use a custom executor here, have a look at CombinedFuture as we'll
    // need to handle RejectedExecutionException

    if (allMustSucceed) {
      // We need fail fast, so we have to keep track of which future failed so we can propagate

     * read operations anyway:
     *
     * - All (unsynchronized) read operations must first read the "count" field, and should not
     * look at table entries if it is 0.
     *
     * - All (synchronized) write operations should write to the "count" field after structurally
     * changing any bin. The operations must not take any action that could even momentarily