* constructor's. This is an arbitrary rule since no existing language spec mandates one way or
     * the other. From the declaration syntax, the class type parameter appears first, but the call
     * syntax may show up in opposite order such as {@code new <A>Foo<B>()}.
     */
    @Override
    public final TypeVariable<?>[] getTypeParameters() {
      TypeVariable<?>[] declaredByClass = getDeclaringClass().getTypeParameters();

But still, FastAPI got quite some inspiration from Requests.

**Requests** is a library to *interact* with APIs (as a client), while **FastAPI** is a library to *build* APIs (as a server).

They are, more or less, at opposite ends, complementing each other.

Requests has a very simple and intuitive design, it's very easy to use, with sensible defaults. But at the same time, it's very powerful and customizable.

   *     filter. If the bits haven't changed, this <i>might</i> be the first time {@code object} has
   *     been added to the filter. Note that {@code put(t)} always returns the <i>opposite</i>
   *     result to what {@code mightContain(t)} would have returned at the time it is called.
   * @since 12.0 (present in 11.0 with {@code void} return type})
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue

  // `OrderedReady`, where pods are created in increasing order (pod-0, then
  // pod-1, etc) and the controller will wait until each pod is ready before
  // continuing. When scaling down, the pods are removed in the opposite order.
  // The alternative policy is `Parallel` which will create pods in parallel
  // to match the desired scale without waiting, and on scale down will delete
  // all pods at once.
  // +optional

does not work in the way described above and you are used to defining trivial compute-only *path operation functions* with plain `def` for a tiny performance gain (about 100 nanoseconds), please note that in **FastAPI** the effect would be quite opposite. In these cases, it's better to use `async def` unless your *path operation functions* use code that performs blocking <abbr title="Input/Output: disk reading or writing, network communications.">I/O</abbr>.

Still, in both situations,...

     * execute all peer settings logic on the writer thread. This relies on the fact that the
     * writer task queue won't reorder tasks; otherwise settings could be applied in the opposite
     * order than received.
     */
    fun applyAndAckSettings(
      clearPrevious: Boolean,
      settings: Settings,
    ) {
      var delta: Long
      var streamsToNotify: Array<Http2Stream>?

// It should be 50% chance of any host initiating the connection.
func (c *Connection) shouldConnect() bool {
	// The remote should have the opposite result.
	h0 := xxh3.HashString(c.Local + c.Remote)
	h1 := xxh3.HashString(c.Remote + c.Local)
	if h0 == h1 {
		return c.Local < c.Remote
	}
	return h0 < h1
}

    } catch (UnknownHostException impossible) {
      throw new AssertionError(impossible);
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns an address from a <b>little-endian ordered</b> byte array (the opposite of what {@link
   * InetAddress#getByAddress} expects).
   *
   * <p>IPv4 address byte array must be 4 bytes long and IPv6 byte array must be 16 bytes long.
   *

  // `OrderedReady`, where pods are created in increasing order (pod-0, then
  // pod-1, etc) and the controller will wait until each pod is ready before
  // continuing. When scaling down, the pods are removed in the opposite order.
  // The alternative policy is `Parallel` which will create pods in parallel
  // to match the desired scale without waiting, and on scale down will delete
  // all pods at once.
  // +optional

  // `OrderedReady`, where pods are created in increasing order (pod-0, then
  // pod-1, etc) and the controller will wait until each pod is ready before
  // continuing. When scaling down, the pods are removed in the opposite order.
  // The alternative policy is `Parallel` which will create pods in parallel
  // to match the desired scale without waiting, and on scale down will delete
  // all pods at once.
  // +optional