color: {{ colors.yellow }}
      - action: add-comment@v1
        args:
          comment: |
            :warning: 'There are new TODOs present in this change.  Should any be removed?'

# To simplify the automations section, some calculations are placed under unique YAML keys defined here.
# Read the "|" not as "or", but as a "pipe", taking the output of the previous command and passing it to the next command.

# Each automation has an `if` key that defines conditions to run the automation,
# as well as a `run` key with the actions to do. All the conditions need to be true
# for the actions to run (there is an implicit AND relation between
# the conditions on each line).  Each condition is specified as a Jinja expression.  You
# can also use the constant `true` if you want to always run the actions.

        }
        FlakyTestStrategy.ONLY -> {
            // Note there is an issue: https://github.com/spockframework/spock/issues/1288
            // JUnit Platform `includeTags` works before Spock engine, thus excludes all spock tests.
            // As a workaround, we tag all non-spock integration tests and use `includeTags(none() | Flaky)` here.

                      'incubating': incubatingInterface]
    }

    def "#member change should not be reported"() {
        expect:
        noViolation(rule)

        where:
        member << [Mock(JApiMethod), Mock(JApiField), Mock(JApiImplementedInterface), Mock(JApiConstructor)]
    }

    def "nothing should be reported if no changes"() {
        expect:
        noViolation(rule)

        when:
        def link = converter.resolve(input, classMetaData, listener)

        then:
        format(link) == '<someLinkElement/>'

        where:
        input << [
                '#someName(SomeClass,Object)',
                '#someName(SomeClass, Object)',
                '#someName(SomeClass,\tObject)',

# Each automation has an `if` key that defines conditions to run the automation,
# as well as a `run` key with the actions to do. All the conditions need to be true
# for the actions to run (there is an implicit AND relation between
# the conditions on each line).  Each condition is specified as a Jinja expression.  You
# can also use the constant `true` if you want to always run the actions.

This has also forced plugins written in languages other than Groovy to use Groovy types for some APIs.

When the Kotlin DSL was introduced, we made an effort to add non-Groovy equivalents for all APIs.
This has been mostly done, but there remain a few holdouts (fixing these is out of scope).

To keep the Groovy DSL ergonomic, we generate methods as necessary from the non-Groovy equivalents.

Doing this provides the following specific benefits:

Java serialization does not enforce type safety as strictly as some alternatives, potentially leading to runtime errors.

## Decision

We do not use Java serialization.
Instead, we use custom serialization where we explicitly describe how data objects should be serialized and deserialized.

For internal purposes, we use binary formats for their brevity.

        }

        for (int i = classesContainingMethod.size() - 1; i > 0; --i) {
            current = classesContainingMethod.get(i)
            if (!isInternal(current)) {
                // there's another public super class which contains target method
                // it would be reported somewhere else
                return false
            }
        }

        You can use [the template](https://github.com/gradle/gradle-issue-reproducer) with a Gradle GitHub action set up to showcase your problem.
        In the rare cases where this is infeasible, we will also accept a detailed set of instructions.
        You can also use [Gradle Project Replicator](https://github.com/android/project-replicator) to reproduce the structure of your project.
    validations: