*/
    @Override
    public ResultData transform(final ResponseData responseData) {
        if (responseData == null || !responseData.hasResponseBody()) {
            throw new CrawlingAccessException("No response body.");
        }

        try (final InputStream is = responseData.getResponseBody()) {
            final DocumentBuilderFactory factory = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();

    logging.info("Pushing branch")
    subprocess.run(["git", "push", "origin", branch_name], check=True)
    logging.info("Creating PR")
    pr = repo.create_pull(title=message, body=message, base="master", head=branch_name)
    logging.info(f"Created PR: {pr.number}")

Es kann nicht sehr gut mit verschachtelten Modellen umgehen. Wenn es sich beim JSON-Body in der Anfrage also um ein JSON-Objekt mit inneren Feldern handelt, die wiederum verschachtelte JSON-Objekte sind, kann er nicht richtig dokumentiert und validiert werden.

/// check | "Inspirierte **FastAPI**"

LoadedGrecaptcha=!0;var e="//www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=reCaptchaLoaded&render=explicit"+(d.lang?"&hl="+d.lang:""),f=document.createElement("script");f.type="text/javascript",f.async=!0,f.defer=!0,f.src=e,document.getElementsByTagName("body")[0].appendChild(f)}};b.reCaptchaLoaded=function(b){b&&"object"==typeof b&&b.length||(b=a("form")),b.each(function(){var b=a(this),c=b.get(0).validationConfig||b.context.validationConfig||!1;c&&a('[data-validation~="recaptcha"]',b).each(function(){var...

It can't handle nested models very well. So, if the JSON body in the request is a JSON object that has inner fields that in turn are nested JSON objects, it cannot be properly documented and validated.

/// check | "Inspired **FastAPI** to"

Use Python types to have great editor support.

* Tự động tài liệu hóa data model theo <a href="https://json-schema.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank"><strong>JSON Schema</strong></a> (OpenAPI bản thân nó được dựa trên JSON Schema).

 * always very useful information.
 *
 * <p>On the other hand, a <i>parameter</i> type of {@link ImmutableList} is generally a nuisance to
 * callers. Instead, accept {@link Iterable} and have your method or constructor body pass it to the
 * appropriate {@code copyOf} method itself.
 *
 * <p>Expressing the immutability guarantee directly in the type that user code references is a

	}

	resp, err := h.client.Do(req)
	if err != nil {
		return fmt.Errorf("%s returned '%w', please check your endpoint configuration", h.Endpoint(), err)
	}

	// Drain any response.
	xhttp.DrainBody(resp.Body)

	if resp.StatusCode >= 200 && resp.StatusCode <= 299 {
		// accepted HTTP status codes.
		return nil
	} else if resp.StatusCode == http.StatusForbidden {

	}
	req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")

	clnt := http.Client{Transport: getRemoteInstanceTransport()}
	resp, err := clnt.Do(req)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}

	xhttp.DrainBody(resp.Body)
	if resp.StatusCode != http.StatusOK {
		return errors.New(resp.Status)
	}

	return nil
}

// Notify notifies notification endpoint if configured regarding job failure or success.

		writeErrorResponse(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(ErrInvalidMaxParts), r.URL)
		return
	}

	var (
		md5hex              = clientETag.String()
		sha256hex           = ""
		reader    io.Reader = r.Body
		s3Error   APIErrorCode
	)
	if s3Error = isPutActionAllowed(ctx, rAuthType, bucket, object, r, policy.PutObjectAction); s3Error != ErrNone {
		writeErrorResponse(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(s3Error), r.URL)
		return