switch t := object.(type) {
	case *gatewayapi.Gateway:
		if !gateway.IsManaged(&t.Spec) {
			return "", nil, fmt.Errorf("gateway is not a managed gateway")
		}
		namespace = t.Namespace
		selector, err = labels.Parse(label.IoK8sNetworkingGatewayGatewayName.Name + "=" + t.Name)
	case *gatewayapibeta.Gateway:
		if !gateway.IsManaged(&t.Spec) {

	// TODO(quasilyte): improve error message (#21860).
	// "invalid VSIB address (missing vector index)"
	VPGATHERQQ Y2, (BP), Y1         // ERROR "invalid instruction"
	// AVX2GATHER mask/index/dest #UD cases.
	VPGATHERQQ Y2, (BP)(X2*2), Y2   // ERROR "mask, index, and destination registers should be distinct"
	VPGATHERQQ Y2, (BP)(X2*2), Y7   // ERROR "mask, index, and destination registers should be distinct"

   1. If the certificate is not yet expired, the `SecretManager` also can return a cache response. In practice, this would
       only happen in cases where Envoy were to re-request a resource, which is fairly rare.
   1. `SecretManager` can also read certificates from files. When this is configured, no CA client is used.

				LastTerminationState: corev1.ContainerState{
					Terminated: &corev1.ContainerStateTerminated{
						Message:  terminationMessage,
						ExitCode: int32(exitCode),
					},
				},
			},
		})
	}

	cases := []struct {
		name   string
		config config.RepairConfig
		pod    *corev1.Pod
		want   bool
	}{
		{
			"Testing OK pod with only ExitCode check",
			config.RepairConfig{

 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.model.building;

/**
 * The transformerContextBuilder is responsible for initializing the TransformerContext.
 * In case rawModels are missing, it could do new buildingRequests on the ModelBuilder.
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 * @deprecated use {@link org.apache.maven.api.services.ModelBuilder} instead
 */
@Deprecated(since = "4.0.0")

  <groupId>com.example.group</groupId>
  <artifactId>valid-version-wrong</artifactId>
  <version>1.0</version>

  <description>
    This will test if the validation for the parent version
    is working correct in case of usage of RELEASE
  </description>

This way, you don't have to know beforehand what the valid field/attribute names are (as would be the case with Pydantic models).

This would be useful if you want to receive keys that you don't already know.

---

Another useful case is when you want to have keys of another type (e.g., `int`).

That's what we are going to see here.

In this case, you would accept any `dict` as long as it has `int` keys with `float` values:

					switch name {
					case "Name":
						if _, ok := first[dbName].(string); !ok {
							t.Errorf("invalid data type for %v, got %#v", dbName, first[dbName])
						}
					case "Age":
						if _, ok := first[dbName].(uint); !ok {
							t.Errorf("invalid data type for %v, got %#v", dbName, first[dbName])
						}
					case "Birthday":
						if _, ok := first[dbName].(*time.Time); !ok {

func (t Type) Valid() bool {
	return t > 0
}

// IsDataReplication returns true if content being replicated
func (t Type) IsDataReplication() bool {
	switch t {
	case ObjectReplicationType, HealReplicationType, ExistingObjectReplicationType:
		return true
	}
	return false
}

// ObjectOpts provides information to deduce whether replication

        // observed too that signatures on error responses are sometimes wrong??
        // Looks like the failure case also is just reflecting back the signature we sent

        // with SMB3's negotiation validation it's no longer possible to ignore this (on the validation response)
        // make sure that validation is performed in any case
        Smb2SigningDigest dgst = getDigest();