assertThat(ackFrame.type).isEqualTo(Http2.TYPE_SETTINGS)
    assertThat(ackFrame.streamId).isEqualTo(0)
    assertThat(ackFrame.ack).isTrue()

    // This stream was created *after* the connection settings were adjusted.
    val stream = connection.newStream(headerEntries("a", "android"), false)
    assertThat(connection.peerSettings.initialWindowSize).isEqualTo(3368)
    // New Stream is has the most recent initial window size.

			break
		}
		if err != nil {
			return err
		}
		f.headerOffset += r.baseOffset
		r.File = append(r.File, f)
	}
	if uint16(len(r.File)) != uint16(end.directoryRecords) { // only compare 16 bits here
		// Return the readDirectoryHeader error if we read
		// the wrong number of directory entries.
		return err
	}
	if zipinsecurepath.Value() == "0" {
		for _, f := range r.File {
			if f.Name == "" {

  managed by the GLBC Ingress Controller. This can cause the health checks to start failing,
  requiring you to reapply the manual edits.
  * This issue does not affect clusters that were already running Kubernetes v1.6.4 or higher.
  * This issue does not affect Health Checks that were left in the configuration
    [originally set by the GLBC Ingress Controller](https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/tree/0.9.0-beta.1/controllers/gce#health-checks).

	}) {
		writeErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(ErrAccessDenied), r.URL)
		return
	}

	if r.ContentLength > maxEConfigJSONSize || r.ContentLength == -1 {
		// More than maxConfigSize bytes were available
		writeErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(ErrAdminConfigTooLarge), r.URL)
		return
	}

	password := cred.SecretKey

    var b = 0
    for (codePoint in input) {
      if (codePoint < INITIAL_N) {
        result.writeByte(codePoint)
        b++
      }
    }

    // Copy a delimiter if any basic code points were emitted.
    if (b > 0) result.writeByte('-'.code)

    var n = INITIAL_N
    var delta = 0
    var bias = INITIAL_BIAS
    var h = b
    while (h < input.size) {

errors.app.double.submit.request=Deine Anfrage wurde möglicherweise bereits verarbeitet. Bitte prüfen und erneut versuchen.

# _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
# you can define your messages here:
# e.g.
#  errors.xxx = ...
#  info.xxx = ...
# _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
# ========================================================================================

        int suppressed = runSuppressionFailureTest(in, out);
        assertThat(suppressed).isAtMost(1);
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * @return the number of exceptions that were suppressed on the expected thrown exception
   */
  private static int runSuppressionFailureTest(CharSource in, CharSink out) {
    try {
      in.copyTo(out);
      fail();
    } catch (IOException expected) {

   * the behavior described in {@link #put(Range, Object) put(range, value)}, however the ranges
   * returned from {@link #asMapOfRanges} will be different if there were existing entries which
   * connect to the given range and value.
   *
   * <p>Even if the input range is empty, if it is connected on both sides by ranges mapped to the
   * same value those two ranges will be coalesced.
   *

 *
 * <p>"IPv4 mapped" addresses were originally a representation of IPv4 addresses for use on an IPv6
 * socket that could receive both IPv4 and IPv6 connections (by disabling the {@code IPV6_V6ONLY}
 * socket option on an IPv6 socket). Yes, it's confusing. Nevertheless, these "mapped" addresses
 * were never supposed to be seen on the wire. That assumption was dropped, some say mistakenly, in

        return sb.toString();
    }

    public Artifact find(Artifact artifact) {
        File artifactFile = new File(getBasedir(), pathOf(artifact));

        // We need to set the file here or the resolver will fail with an NPE, not fully equipped to deal
        // with multiple local repository implementations yet.
        artifact.setFile(artifactFile);

        return artifact;
    }