}

    @Test
    void testConstructor() {
        // Verify that the response is created with correct configuration and buffer
        assertNotNull(response);

        // Use reflection to verify the outputBuffer is set correctly
        try {
            Field outputBufferField = TransTransactNamedPipeResponse.class.getDeclaredField("outputBuffer");

        result = response.readParametersWireFormat(smallBuffer, 0, -1);
        assertEquals(0, result);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test command type is correct")
    void testCommandType() {
        // Verify that the command is not set in constructor (defaults to 0)
        assertEquals(0, response.getCommand());

        // Verify we can change the subcommand

  }

  /*
   * This is somewhat of a weak test; we verify that all of the methods are
   * correct, but not that they're actually forwarding correctly. We also rely
   * on the other tests (e.g., SynchronizedSetTest) to verify that the
   * collection views are synchronized correctly.
   */

  public void testSize() {
    int unused = create().size();
  }

  public void testIsEmpty() {

                    "Result should be either Unicode or ASCII fallback for " + icon + ", got: " + result);
        }
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("should return correct Unicode characters")
    void shouldReturnCorrectUnicodeCharacters() {
        assertEquals('✓', ConsoleIcon.SUCCESS.getUnicodeChar());
        assertEquals('✗', ConsoleIcon.ERROR.getUnicodeChar());

            assertTrue(cause instanceof SMBProtocolDecodingException, "Actual cause should be SMBProtocolDecodingException");
            assertEquals("Structure size is not 16", cause.getMessage(), "Should have correct error message");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should write empty bytes for wire format")
        void testWriteBytesWireFormat() throws Exception {
            // Given

E as ferramentas também ficarão felizes porque `RedirectResponse` e ​​`JSONResponse` são subclasses de `Response`, então a anotação de tipo está correta.

### Anote uma subclasse de Response { #annotate-a-response-subclass }

Você também pode usar uma subclasse de `Response` na anotação de tipo:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial003_03_py39.py hl[8:9] *}

            // Encode at position 100
            int encoded = context.encode(buffer, 100);
            assertEquals(context.size(), encoded);

            // Verify salt is at correct position
            for (int i = 0; i < salt.length; i++) {
                assertEquals((byte) 0xFF, buffer[100 + 4 + 4 + i]);
            }
        }
    }

    @Nested

import jcifs.internal.util.SMBUtil;

/**
 * Test class for FsctlPipeWaitRequest
 */
class FsctlPipeWaitRequestTest {

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test constructor with name only sets correct fields")
    void testConstructorWithNameOnly() {
        // Test with simple pipe name
        String pipeName = "TestPipe";
        FsctlPipeWaitRequest request = new FsctlPipeWaitRequest(pipeName);

            populatedArray.s[i] = entry;
        }

        // Replace the info.e field with our populated array
        setDfsEnumArray(dfsRootEnum, populatedArray);

        // Test getEntries returns correct SmbShareInfo objects
        FileEntry[] entries = dfsRootEnum.getEntries();
        assertNotNull(entries);
        assertEquals(3, entries.length);

        // Verify each entry
        for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {

        assertNotNull(middle, "Middle tree should not be null");
        assertNotNull(inner, "Inner tree should not be null");
        assertSame(middleTree, middle, "Should return correct middle tree");
        assertSame(innerTree, inner, "Should return correct inner tree");
    }

    /**
     * Test for unwrap with incompatible type.
     * Verifies behavior when trying to unwrap to an incompatible type.
     */
    @Test