},
                                                "istio": {
                                                    "workload": "reviews-v3;default;reviews;v3;Kubernetes"
                                                }
                                            }
                                        },

    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: http://goo.gl/okTTdr
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make

      - {{ is.formatting }}
    run:
      - action: add-label@v1
        args:
          label: 'a:chore'
      - action: approve@v1

  # Call out PRs that change the build script (and will be longer to checkout and review)
  label_build_script_change:
    if:
      - {{ ('misc_labels' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
      - {{ is.build_script_change }}
    run:
      - action: add-label@v1
        args:

  // +optional
  map<string, string> annotations = 2;

  // Namespace is the namespace the pod is being created in.
  // +optional
  optional string namespace = 3;
}

// ImageReviewStatus is the result of the review for the pod creation request.
message ImageReviewStatus {
  // Allowed indicates that all images were allowed to be run.
  optional bool allowed = 1;

  // Reason should be empty unless Allowed is false in which case it

    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: http://goo.gl/okTTdr
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make

                                        "name": "inbound-vip|9080||reviews.default.svc.cluster.local-http",
                                        "typed_config": {
                                          "@type": "type.googleapis.com/google.protobuf.StringValue",
                                          "value": "inbound-vip|9080||reviews.default.svc.cluster.local-http"
                                        }

							<em class="fa fa-search">
						</button>
					</div>
				</div>
			</form>
		</c:if>
		<nav class="mt-2">

		<ul class="nav nav-pills nav-sidebar flex-column" data-widget="treeview" role="menu">
			<li class="nav-header"><la:message key="labels.sidebar.menu" /></li>
			<c:if test="${fe:permission('admin-dashboard-view')}">
				<li class="nav-item">

Ich höre gerne, wie **FastAPI** verwendet wird, was Ihnen daran gefallen hat, in welchem Projekt/Unternehmen Sie es verwenden, usw.

## Für FastAPI abstimmen

* <a href="https://www.slant.co/options/34241/~fastapi-review" class="external-link" target="_blank">Stimmen Sie für **FastAPI** auf Slant</a >.
* <a href="https://alternativeto.net/software/fastapi/about/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Stimmen Sie für **FastAPI** auf AlternativeTo</a>.

                                        "name": "inbound-vip|9080||reviews.default.svc.cluster.local-http",
                                        "typed_config": {
                                          "@type": "type.googleapis.com/google.protobuf.StringValue",
                                          "value": "inbound-vip|9080||reviews.default.svc.cluster.local-http"
                                        }

# consult https://www.iana.org/time-zones for the latest versions,
# update CODE and DATA below, and then run
#
#	./update.bash -commit
#
# That will prepare the files and create the commit.
#
# To review such a commit (as the reviewer), use:
#
#	git codereview change NNNNNN   # CL number
#	cd lib/time
#	./update.bash
#
# If it prints "No updates needed.", then the generated files