// Use context handle bytes to create a unique ID
        StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder("WITNESS-");
        for (int i = 0; i < Math.min(contextHandle.length, 8); i++) {
            sb.append(String.format("%02X", contextHandle[i] & 0xFF));
        }
        sb.append("-").append(shareName.hashCode());

        return sb.toString();
    }

    /**

    line_spans: __span
  pymdownx.inlinehilite: null
  pymdownx.keys: null
  pymdownx.mark: null
  pymdownx.superfences:
    custom_fences:
    - name: mermaid
      class: mermaid
      format: !!python/name:pymdownx.superfences.fence_code_format ''
  pymdownx.tilde: null
  pymdownx.blocks.admonition:
    types:
    - note
    - attention
    - caution
    - danger
    - error
    - tip

# Object Lambda

         */
        public String getVersion() {
            return version;
        }

        /**
         * Gets the filename of the artifact JAR file.
         *
         * @return the filename in the format "name-version.jar"
         */
        public String getFileName() {
            return name + "-" + version + ".jar";
        }

        /**
         * Gets the URL where the artifact can be downloaded.

type ResyncTargetDecision struct {
	Replicate       bool
	ResetID         string
	ResetBeforeDate time.Time
}

var errInvalidReplicateDecisionFormat = fmt.Errorf("ReplicateDecision has invalid format")

// parse k-v pairs of target ARN to stringified ReplicateTargetDecision delimited by ',' into a
// ReplicateDecision struct

        // Given
        byte[] buffer = new byte[64];
        int bufferIndex = 8;

        // Prepare test data in buffer (40 bytes of data)
        // Use SMBUtil to properly encode times in Windows FILETIME format
        SMBUtil.writeTime(TEST_CREATE_TIME, buffer, bufferIndex);
        SMBUtil.writeTime(TEST_LAST_ACCESS_TIME, buffer, bufferIndex + 8);
        SMBUtil.writeTime(TEST_LAST_WRITE_TIME, buffer, bufferIndex + 16);

///

Les réponses générées au format OpenAPI pour cette *opération de chemin* seront :

```JSON hl_lines="3-12"
{
    "responses": {
        "404": {
            "description": "Additional Response",
            "content": {

        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("ToString Tests")
    class ToStringTests {

        @ParameterizedTest
        @DisplayName("Should format command name correctly")
        @ValueSource(shorts = { 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E, 0x0F, 0x10, 0x11,
                0x12 })

          },
          "editorMode": "code",
          "exemplar": true,
          "expr": "sum by (bucket,range) (minio_bucket_objects_size_distribution{job=~\"$scrape_jobs\"})",
          "format": "time_series",
          "instant": false,
          "interval": "",
          "intervalFactor": 1,
          "legendFormat": "{{bucket,range}}",
          "refId": "A",
          "step": 300
        }

E eles podem tentar de novo sabendo que provavelmente é algo mais parecido com `stanleyjobsox` do que com `johndoe`.

#### Um ataque "profissional"

Claro, os invasores não tentariam tudo isso de forma manual, eles escreveriam um programa para fazer isso, possivelmente com milhares ou milhões de testes por segundo. E obteriam apenas uma letra a mais por vez.