//                                                                              ======
    @Override
    protected int delegateSelectCountUniquely(final ConditionBean cb) {
        // #pending check response and cast problem
        final SearchRequestBuilder builder = client.prepareSearch(asEsIndex());
        final EsAbstractConditionBean esCb = (EsAbstractConditionBean) cb;
        if (esCb.getPreference() != null) {

  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {

    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }

            } else {
                this.createContexts = null;
            }
        }

        // Set oplock level
        setRequestedOplockLevel(oplockLevel);
    }

    /**
     * Check if this request has lease contexts
     * @return true if lease contexts are present
     */
    public boolean hasLeaseContext() {
        if (this.createContexts != null) {

                return analyzeResponse.getTokens();
            } catch (final IllegalArgumentException e) {
                return analyze(text, field, lang);
            }
        }
    }

    /**
     * Check if the language is supported.
     * @param lang Language
     * @return True if the language is supported
     */
    public static boolean isSupportedLanguage(final String lang) {

     */
    @Size(max = 1000)
    public String ignoreFailureType;

    /**
     * Threshold for failure count before stopping crawling of a URL.
     * Set to -1 to disable the threshold check.
     */
    @Required
    @Min(-1)
    @Max(10000)
    @ValidateTypeFailure
    public Integer failureCountThreshold;

    /**
     * Enable or disable popular word tracking and display.

        IntervalRule rule = new IntervalRule("10:00", "18:00", "1", 1000); // Sunday only

        // Test day overflow (day 8 should be treated as day 1)
        // For same-day rules, it should check the day directly
        assertTrue(rule.isTarget(12, 30, 8)); // Should be treated as day 1 (Sunday)

        // Test with cross-midnight rule

    busyQueues.add(queue)
  }

  private fun afterRun(
    task: Task,
    delayNanos: Long,
    completedNormally: Boolean,
  ) {
    assertLockHeld()

    val queue = task.queue!!
    check(queue.activeTask === task)

    val cancelActiveTask = queue.cancelActiveTask
    queue.cancelActiveTask = false
    queue.activeTask = null
    busyQueues.remove(queue)

  // Why 1000?  WHY NOT!
  private static final int MAX_BUSY_WAIT_SPINS = 1000;

  @Override
  public final void run() {
    /*
     * Set runner thread before checking isDone(). If we were to check isDone() first, the task
     * might be cancelled before we set the runner thread. That would make it impossible to
     * interrupt, yet it will still run, since interruptTask will leave the runner value null,

  public ThreadFactory build() {
    return doBuild(this);
  }

  // Split out so that the anonymous ThreadFactory can't contain a reference back to the builder.
  // At least, I assume that's why. TODO(cpovirk): Check, and maybe add a test for this.
  @SuppressWarnings("ThreadPriorityCheck") // We only propagate user requests (which we discourage).
  private static ThreadFactory doBuild(ThreadFactoryBuilder builder) {