default -> throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unsupported time encoding");
        };
    }

    /*
     * Decode times
     */

    /**
     * Decodes a Date value according to the specified time encoding type.
     *
     * @param src the source byte array
     * @param si the starting index in the source array
     * @param enc the time encoding type (e.g., TIME_1970_SEC_32BE)

        Guava's main yardstick for evaluating proposed features can be summed up as [utility times
        ubiquity](https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/PhilosophyExplained#utility-times-ubiquity).


        #### Utility: compare with alternatives


        There is always *some* alternative to adding a new feature to Guava, even if it's just

          return null;
        });

    assertEquals(incrementByNanos * numberOfThreads, ticker.read());
  }

  /** Runs {@code callable} concurrently {@code numberOfThreads} times. */
  @GwtIncompatible // concurrency
  private void runConcurrentTest(int numberOfThreads, Callable<@Nullable Void> callable)
      throws Exception {
    ExecutorService executorService = newFixedThreadPool(numberOfThreads);

    val elapsedUntilPong3 = System.nanoTime() - startNanos
    assertThat(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis(elapsedUntilPong3).toDouble())
      .isCloseTo(1500.0, 250.0)

    // The client pinged the server 3 times, and it has ponged back 3 times.
    assertThat(webSocket.sentPingCount()).isEqualTo(3)
    assertThat(server.receivedPingCount()).isEqualTo(3)
    assertThat(webSocket.receivedPongCount()).isEqualTo(3)

In this case, it would be better to get **one extra server** and run some processes on it so that they all have **enough RAM and CPU time**.

            auth1.equals(auth2);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Test that password comparison is constant-time by comparing execution times
     * for passwords that differ at different positions.
     */
    @Test
    public void testConstantTimePasswordComparison() throws Exception {

        // Verify that server-side path engaged at least the initial opens
        verify(src, times(1)).openUnshared(anyInt(), anyInt(), anyInt(), anyInt(), anyInt());
        verify(dest, times(1)).openUnshared(anyInt(), anyInt(), anyInt(), anyInt(), anyInt());
    }

    // --- WriterThread behavior ---

    @Test

        }
    }

    /**
     * Parses a time string in HH:MM format.
     *
     * @param time the time string to parse
     * @return an array containing [hour, minute]
     * @throws FessSystemException if the time format is invalid
     */
    protected static int[] parseTime(final String time) {
        final String[] froms = time.split(":");
        if (froms.length != 2) {

	lockRetryMinInterval = 250 * time.Millisecond
	if lri := env.Get("_MINIO_LOCK_RETRY_INTERVAL", ""); lri != "" {
		v, err := strconv.Atoi(lri)
		if err != nil {
			panic(err)
		}
		lockRetryMinInterval = time.Duration(v) * time.Millisecond
	}

	lockRetryBackOff = backoffWait(
		lockRetryMinInterval,
		100*time.Millisecond,
		5*time.Second,
	)
}

func log(format string, data ...any) {

      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

  @Override