/**
 * A functional interface for <a
 * href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_(discrete_mathematics)">graph</a>-structured data.
 *
 * <p>This interface is meant to be used as the type of a parameter to graph algorithms (such as
 * breadth first traversal) that only need a way of accessing the successors of a node in a graph.
 *
 * <h3>Usage</h3>
 *
 * Given an algorithm, for example:
 *
 * {@snippet :

        listen  [::]:9000;
        server_name  localhost;

        # To allow special characters in headers
        ignore_invalid_headers off;
        # Allow any size file to be uploaded.
        # Set to a value such as 1000m; to restrict file size to a specific value
        client_max_body_size 0;
        # To disable buffering
        proxy_buffering off;
        proxy_request_buffering off;

        location / {

        listen  [::]:9000;
        server_name  localhost;

        # To allow special characters in headers
        ignore_invalid_headers off;
        # Allow any size file to be uploaded.
        # Set to a value such as 1000m; to restrict file size to a specific value
        client_max_body_size 0;
        # To disable buffering
        proxy_buffering off;
        proxy_request_buffering off;

        location / {

   *
   * </blockquote>
   */
  RESTRICTS_ELEMENTS,

  /**
   * Indicates that a collection has a well-defined ordering of its elements. The ordering may
   * depend on the element values, such as a {@link SortedSet}, or on the insertion ordering, such
   * as a {@link LinkedHashSet}. All list tests and sorted-collection tests automatically specify
   * this feature.
   */
  KNOWN_ORDER,

  /**

 * <i>type</i> offering meaningful behavioral guarantees. This is substantially different from the
 * case of (say) {@link HashSet}, which is an <i>implementation</i>, with semantics that were
 * largely defined by its supertype.
 *
 * <p>For field types and method return types, you should generally use the immutable type (such as

- Whether the reported vulnerability exists.
- The conditions that are required such that the vulnerability can be exploited.
- The steps required to fix the vulnerability.

In general, if the vulnerability exists in one of the MinIO code bases
itself - not in a code dependency - then MinIO will, if possible, fix
the vulnerability or implement reasonable countermeasures such that the

   * fact the static type of {@link Throwable} is occasionally justified even for a method with no
   * {@code throws} clause: Some such methods can in fact throw a checked exception (e.g., by
   * calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.

   * fact the static type of {@link Throwable} is occasionally justified even for a method with no
   * {@code throws} clause: Some such methods can in fact throw a checked exception (e.g., by
   * calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.

   *
   * <p>The default implementation returns {@link Optional#absent}. Some sources, such as a {@code
   * CharSequence}, may return a non-absent value. Note that in such cases, it is <i>possible</i>
   * that this method will return a different number of chars than would be returned by reading all
   * of the chars.
   *
   * <p>Additionally, for mutable sources such as {@code StringBuilder}s, a subsequent read may

   *
   * <p>The default implementation returns {@link Optional#absent}. Some sources, such as a {@code
   * CharSequence}, may return a non-absent value. Note that in such cases, it is <i>possible</i>
   * that this method will return a different number of chars than would be returned by reading all
   * of the chars.
   *
   * <p>Additionally, for mutable sources such as {@code StringBuilder}s, a subsequent read may