// Test user boost
        item.setUserBoost(2.0f);
        assertEquals(2.0f, item.getUserBoost(), 0.001f);

        // Test readings
        String[][] newReadings = { { "read1", "read2" }, { "read3" } };
        item.setReadings(newReadings);
        assertArrayEquals(newReadings, item.getReadings());

        // Test fields
        String[] fields = { "field1", "field2" };
        item.setFields(fields);

        percentIndex = i;
        break;
      } else if (Character.digit(c, 16) == -1) {
        return null; // Everything else must be a decimal or hex digit.
      }
    }

    // Now decide which address family to parse.
    if (hasColon) {
      if (hasDot) {
        ipString = convertDottedQuadToHex(ipString);
        if (ipString == null) {
          return null;
        }
      }

   * <p>On the other hand, if for example we are resolving {@code List<A extends B>} to {@code
   * List<A extends String>}, we need to compare that {@code <A extends B>} is unequal to {@code <A
   * extends String>} in order to decide to use the transformed type instead of the original type.
   */
  static final class TypeVariableKey {
    private final TypeVariable<?> var;

    TypeVariableKey(TypeVariable<?> var) {

      while (true) {
        var tryAgain = false
        var readBytesDelivered = -1L
        var errorExceptionToDeliver: IOException? = null

        // 1. Decide what to do in a synchronized block.

        withLock {
          val doReadTimeout = doReadTimeout()
          if (doReadTimeout) {
            readTimeout.enter()
          }
          try {

Now let's **refactor** this app a bit to increase **security** and **versatility**.

If you check the previous app, in the UI you can see that, up to now, it lets the client decide the `id` of the `Hero` to create. 😱

We shouldn't let that happen, they could overwrite an `id` we already have assigned in the DB. Deciding the `id` should be done by the **backend** or the **database**, **not by the client**.

/// note | Nota

Observa que `response_model` es un parámetro del método "decorador" (`get`, `post`, etc). No de tu *path operation function*, como todos los parámetros y el cuerpo.

///

`response_model` recibe el mismo tipo que declararías para un campo de modelo Pydantic, por lo que puede ser un modelo de Pydantic, pero también puede ser, por ejemplo, un `list` de modelos de Pydantic, como `List[Item]`.

      }
      drainQueue();
      return created;
    }

    // N.B. Draining the queue is only necessary to ensure that we don't accumulate empty references
    // in the array. We could skip this if we decide we don't care about holding on to Reference
    // objects indefinitely.
    private void drainQueue() {
      Reference<? extends L> ref;
      while ((ref = queue.poll()) != null) {

   * <p>On the other hand, if for example we are resolving {@code List<A extends B>} to {@code
   * List<A extends String>}, we need to compare that {@code <A extends B>} is unequal to {@code <A
   * extends String>} in order to decide to use the transformed type instead of the original type.
   */
  static final class TypeVariableKey {
    private final TypeVariable<?> var;

    TypeVariableKey(TypeVariable<?> var) {

        percentIndex = i;
        break;
      } else if (Character.digit(c, 16) == -1) {
        return null; // Everything else must be a decimal or hex digit.
      }
    }

    // Now decide which address family to parse.
    if (hasColon) {
      if (hasDot) {
        ipString = convertDottedQuadToHex(ipString);
        if (ipString == null) {
          return null;
        }
      }

I'll tell you a bit more about these **concepts** here, and that would hopefully give you the **intuition** you would need to decide how to deploy your API in very different environments, possibly even in **future** ones that don't exist yet.

By considering these concepts, you will be able to **evaluate and design** the best way to deploy **your own APIs**.