* references (currently executing code, file descriptors).
     * 
     * Depending on the usage scenario, this may have some benefit as there won't be any delays for restablishing these
     * resources, however comes at the cost of having to properly release all SmbFile instances you no longer need.
     * 
     * @return whether to use strict resource lifecycle
     */
    boolean isStrictResourceLifecycle ();


    /**

  TFE_DEVICE_PLACEMENT_EXPLICIT = 0,
  // Copy the tensor to the right device but log a warning.
  TFE_DEVICE_PLACEMENT_WARN = 1,
  // Silently copy the tensor, which has a performance cost since the operation
  // will be blocked till the copy completes. This is the default placement
  // policy.
  TFE_DEVICE_PLACEMENT_SILENT = 2,
  // Placement policy which silently copies int32 tensors but not other dtypes.

    THE COVERED SOFTWARE IS WITH YOU. SHOULD ANY COVERED SOFTWARE PROVE
    DEFECTIVE IN ANY RESPECT, YOU (NOT THE INITIAL DEVELOPER OR ANY
    OTHER CONTRIBUTOR) ASSUME THE COST OF ANY NECESSARY SERVICING,
    REPAIR OR CORRECTION. THIS DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY CONSTITUTES AN
    ESSENTIAL PART OF THIS LICENSE. NO USE OF ANY COVERED SOFTWARE IS
    AUTHORIZED HEREUNDER EXCEPT UNDER THIS DISCLAIMER.

  /**
   * This neat test shows that no matter what weights we use in our requests, if we push X amount of
   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a
   * timeToWarmUp() period, it will cost as the prescribed amount of time. E.g., calling
   * [acquire(5), acquire(1)] takes exactly the same time as [acquire(2), acquire(3), acquire(1)].
   */
  public void testTimeToWarmUpIsHonouredEvenWithWeights() {

 *       add overloads that accept start and end indexes.
 *   <li>Can be streamed without "breaking the chain": {@code foo.getBarLongs().stream()...}.
 *   <li>Access to all collection-based utilities via {@link #asList} (though at the cost of
 *       allocating garbage).
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code long[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).

  /**
   * This neat test shows that no matter what weights we use in our requests, if we push X amount of
   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a
   * timeToWarmUp() period, it will cost as the prescribed amount of time. E.g., calling
   * [acquire(5), acquire(1)] takes exactly the same time as [acquire(2), acquire(3), acquire(1)].
   */
  public void testTimeToWarmUpIsHonouredEvenWithWeights() {

 *       add overloads that accept start and end indexes.
 *   <li>Can be streamed without "breaking the chain": {@code foo.getBarInts().stream()...}.
 *   <li>Access to all collection-based utilities via {@link #asList} (though at the cost of
 *       allocating garbage).
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).

- Fixed a bug where CEL expressions in CRD validation rules would incorrectly compute a high estimated cost for functions that return strings, lists or maps.

   * C} will be excluded from automated serialization test performed by this method.
   */
  @Test
  public void testSerializable() throws Exception {
    // TODO: when we use @BeforeClass, we can pay the cost of class path scanning only once.
    for (Class<?> classToTest :
        findClassesToTest(loadClassesInPackage(), SERIALIZABLE_TEST_METHOD_NAMES)) {
      if (Serializable.class.isAssignableFrom(classToTest)) {
        try {

# disable_pgv: disables protoc-gen-validation. This is not used buts adds many MB to Envoy protos
# not set vtprotobuf: this adds some performance improvement, but at a binary cost increase that is not worth it for the agent
AGENT_TAGS=agent,disable_pgv
# disable_pgv: disables protoc-gen-validation. This is not used buts adds many MB to Envoy protos
# vtprotobuf: enables optimized protobuf marshalling.