Y un response con un código de estado `200` que usa tu `response_model`, pero incluye un `example` personalizado:

{* ../../docs_src/additional_responses/tutorial003_py310.py hl[20:31] *}

Todo se combinará e incluirá en tu OpenAPI, y se mostrará en la documentación de la API:

<img src="/img/tutorial/additional-responses/image01.png">

    assertThat(request.tag<Any>()).isSameInstanceAs(objectTag)
    assertThat(request.tag(Any::class)).isSameInstanceAs(objectTag)
    assertThat(request.tag(String::class)).isSameInstanceAs(stringTag)

    // TODO check for Jvm or handle Long/long correctly
//    assertThat(request.tag(Long::class)).isSameAs(longTag)
  }

  /** Confirm that we don't accidentally share the backing map between objects. */
  @Test

    assertThat(Strings.lenientFormat(null, 5, 6)).isEqualTo("null [5, 6]");
    assertThat(Strings.lenientFormat("%s", (Object) null)).isEqualTo("null");
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible // TODO(b/319404022): Allow passing null array as varargs
  public void testLenientFormat_nullArrayVarargs() {
    assertThat(Strings.lenientFormat("%s", (Object[]) null)).isEqualTo("(Object[])null");
  }

   */
  private void assertSuppressed(Suppression... expected) {
    assertEquals(ImmutableList.copyOf(expected), suppressor.suppressions);
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): Just use addSuppressed+getSuppressed now that we can rely on it.
  /** Suppressor that records suppressions. */
  private static class TestSuppressor implements Closer.Suppressor {

   */
  @SuppressWarnings("ThreadPriorityCheck") // TODO: b/175898629 - Consider onSpinWait?
  static void delay(long millis) throws InterruptedException {
    long startTime = System.nanoTime();
    long ns = millis * 1000 * 1000;
    for (; ; ) {
      if (millis > 0L) {
        Thread.sleep(millis);
      } else {
        // too short to sleep
        Thread.yield();
      }

    reject.set(false);
    executor.execute(task);
    assertEquals(1, numCalls.get());
  }

  /*
   * Under Android, MyError propagates up and fails the test?
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Does this matter to prod users, or is it just a feature of our testing
   * environment? If the latter, maybe write a custom Executor that avoids failing the test when it
   * sees an Error?
   */

import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Nullable;

import static java.util.Objects.requireNonNull;

/**
 * Request used to build a {@link org.apache.maven.api.Project} using
 * the {@link ProjectBuilder} service.
 *
 * TODO: add validationLevel, activeProfileIds, inactiveProfileIds, resolveDependencies
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
@Immutable
public interface ProjectBuilderRequest extends RepositoryAwareRequest {

    /**

            List<RemoteRepository> repositories,
            DependencyFilter dependencyFilter,
            UnaryOperator<String> interpolator)
            throws ExtensionResolutionException {
        try {
            /* TODO: Enhance the PluginDependenciesResolver to provide a
             * resolveCoreExtension method which uses a CoreExtension
             * object instead of a Plugin as this makes no sense.
             */

                        .flatMap(Lifecycle::allPhases)
                        .map(Lifecycle.Phase::name)
                        .toList();
                // TODO: add goals dynamically
                List<String> goals = List.of("wrapper:wrapper");
                names = Stream.concat(phases.stream(), goals.stream()).toList();
            } catch (LookupException e) {

        VersionRange range1 = VersionRange.createFromVersionSpec("1.0");
        VersionRange range2 = VersionRange.createFromVersionSpec("1.1");
        VersionRange mergedRange = range1.restrict(range2);
        // TODO current policy is to retain the original version - is this correct, do we need strategies or is that
        // handled elsewhere?