* algorithm, x86 variant</a> (little-endian variant), using the given seed value, <b>with a known
   * bug</b> as described in the deprecation text.
   *
   * <p>The C++ equivalent is the MurmurHash3_x86_32 function (Murmur3A), which however does not
   * have the bug.
   *
   * @deprecated This implementation produces incorrect hash values from the {@link

   * of their elements."
   *
   * </blockquote>
   */
  RESTRICTS_ELEMENTS,

  /**
   * Indicates that a collection has a well-defined ordering of its elements. The ordering may
   * depend on the element values, such as a {@link SortedSet}, or on the insertion ordering, such
   * as a {@link LinkedHashSet}. All list tests and sorted-collection tests automatically specify
   * this feature.
   */
  KNOWN_ORDER,

  /**

  static int checkNonNegative(int value) {
    checkArgument(value >= 0, "Not true that %s is non-negative.", value);
    return value;
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static long checkNonNegative(long value) {
    checkArgument(value >= 0, "Not true that %s is non-negative.", value);
    return value;
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static int checkPositive(int value) {

  static int checkNonNegative(int value) {
    checkArgument(value >= 0, "Not true that %s is non-negative.", value);
    return value;
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static long checkNonNegative(long value) {
    checkArgument(value >= 0, "Not true that %s is non-negative.", value);
    return value;
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static int checkPositive(int value) {

        } catch (Exception e) {
            throw new RuntimeException("Failed to get field value: " + fieldName, e);
        }
    }

    private void setFieldValue(Object obj, String fieldName, Object value) throws Exception {
        Field field = getField(obj.getClass(), fieldName);
        field.setAccessible(true);
        field.set(obj, value);
    }

        // Verify watchTree flag is set to 0x01
        assertEquals(0x01, dst[dstIndex + 6]);
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @DisplayName("Test writeSetupWireFormat with various FID values")
    @ValueSource(ints = { 0x0000, 0x0001, 0x7FFF, 0xFFFF, 0x1234, 0xABCD })
    void testWriteSetupWireFormatWithVariousFids(int fid) {

        }

        public void setRequestURI(String requestURI) {
            this.requestURI = requestURI;
        }

        public void addHeader(String name, String value) {
            headers.put(name, value);
        }

        @Override
        public String getQueryString() {
            return queryString;
        }

        @Override
        public String getServletPath() {

    @Test
    void testReadParameterWordsWireFormat_bufDataStartIsNotZero() {
        // Test case when bufDataStart is not 0.
        response.bufDataStart = 50; // Initial non-zero value
        byte[] buffer = new byte[37]; // 3 reserved + 8*4 bytes for int4 values + 2 bytes for setupCount
        int bufferIndex = 0;

        // Reserved bytes
        buffer[bufferIndex++] = 0x00;
        buffer[bufferIndex++] = 0x00;

    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(strings = { "192.168.0", "abcd", "192.168" })
    void isDotQuadIPRejectsNonDotQuad(String value) {
        assertFalse(UniAddress.isDotQuadIP(value), "isDotQuadIP should return false for non IP-like values");
    }

    @Test
    void isDotQuadIPHandlesEmptyString() {
        // Empty string should return false, not throw exception

  /**
   * Returns a {@code MapJoiner} using the given key-value separator, and the same configuration as
   * this {@code Joiner} otherwise.
   *
   * @since 20.0
   */
  public MapJoiner withKeyValueSeparator(char keyValueSeparator) {
    return withKeyValueSeparator(String.valueOf(keyValueSeparator));
  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@code MapJoiner} using the given key-value separator, and the same configuration as