*       instance.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h4>Warnings</h4>
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li><b>Warning:</b> as with any collection, it is almost always a bad idea to modify an element
 *       (in a way that affects its {@link Object#equals} behavior) while it is contained in a
 *       collection. Undefined behavior and bugs will result. It's generally best to avoid using

 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class MapPutTester<K, V> extends AbstractMapTester<K, V> {
  private Entry<K, V> nullKeyEntry;

            str,
            Doc(
                """
                A path prefix handled by a proxy that is not seen by the application
                but is seen by external clients, which affects things like Swagger UI.

                Read more about it at the
                [FastAPI docs for Behind a Proxy](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/advanced/behind-a-proxy/).

                **Example**

 *   networkService.send(packet);
 * }
 * }
 *
 * <p>It is important to note that the number of permits requested <i>never</i> affects the
 * throttling of the request itself (an invocation to {@code acquire(1)} and an invocation to {@code
 * acquire(1000)} will result in exactly the same throttling, if any), but it affects the throttling
 * of the <i>next</i> request. I.e., if an expensive task arrives at an idle RateLimiter, it will be

        List<FileNotifyInformation> notifications = response.getNotifyInformation();

        // Verify initial state
        assertEquals(2, notifications.size());

        // Modify input list - should not affect returned list
        inputList.clear();
        assertEquals(2, notifications.size());

        // Try to modify returned list - behavior depends on implementation

 * @param <V> the value type of the map to be tested.
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@NullMarked
public abstract class AbstractMapTester<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>

configuration using e.g. the `mc admin config` commands you will need to adjust
your deployment.

Even though this change is backward compatible we do not expect that it affects
the vast majority of deployments in any negative way.

> Will an upgrade of an existing MinIO cluster impact the SLA of the cluster or will it even cause downtime?

 *
 * @author Jesse Wilson
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtIncompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class NavigableSetNavigationTester<E> extends AbstractSetTester<E> {

 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class CollectionRetainAllTester<E> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {

        assertArrayEquals(testPassword, auth.getPasswordAsCharArray());
        assertEquals(new String(testPassword), auth.getPassword());

        // Verify that modifying original array doesn't affect stored password
        Arrays.fill(testPassword, 'Y');
        assertEquals("CharArrayPass789!", auth.getPassword());
    }

    /**
     * Test domain constructor with char array
     */
    @Test