# before anything else.
#
# Note: Cluster configuration topology file specifies basic configuration of each
# KinD cluster like its name, pod and service subnets and network_id. If two cluster
# have the same network_id then they belong to the same network and their pods can
# talk to each other directly.
#
# [{ "cluster_name": "cluster1","pod_subnet": "10.10.0.0/16","svc_subnet": "10.255.10.0/24","network_id": "0" },

Because Ztunnel can have Istio semantics baked in, we do not need to encode all this information on the wire.
Instead, an Istio specific field like `ExpectedTLSIdentity: spiffe://foo.bar` can encode the same information, at a fraction of the cost.

In our testing, even the most generous representations give custom types a 10x edge (in size, allocations, and CPU time) over Envoy types.

   * {@code put()} or {@code putAll()}, or {@code setValue()} on its entries.
   *
   * <p>In contrast, the maps returned by {@code rowMap().get()} have the same behavior as those
   * returned by {@link #row}. Those maps may support {@code setValue()}, {@code put()}, and {@code
   * putAll()}.
   *
   * @return a map view from each row key to a secondary map from column keys to values

    entry.setValueReference(oldValueRef);

    // no entry
    assertFalse(segment.replace(key, hash, oldValue, newValue));
    assertEquals(0, segment.count);

    // same value
    table.set(index, entry);
    segment.count++;
    assertEquals(1, segment.count);
    assertSame(oldValue, segment.get(key, hash));
    assertTrue(segment.replace(key, hash, oldValue, newValue));

    entry.setValueReference(oldValueRef);

    // no entry
    assertFalse(segment.replace(key, hash, oldValue, newValue));
    assertEquals(0, segment.count);

    // same value
    table.set(index, entry);
    segment.count++;
    assertEquals(1, segment.count);
    assertSame(oldValue, segment.get(key, hash));
    assertTrue(segment.replace(key, hash, oldValue, newValue));

  }

  public void testFutureCancellableBeforeFunctionCompletion() throws Exception {
    // Set the result in a separate thread since this test runs the function
    // (which will block) in the same thread.
    new Thread() {
      @Override
      public void run() {
        inputFuture.set(SLOW_FUNC_VALID_INPUT_DATA);
      }
    }.start();
    funcIsWaitingLatch.await();

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

  }

  public void testFutureCancellableBeforeFunctionCompletion() throws Exception {
    // Set the result in a separate thread since this test runs the function
    // (which will block) in the same thread.
    new Thread() {
      @Override
      public void run() {
        inputFuture.set(SLOW_FUNC_VALID_INPUT_DATA);
      }
    }.start();
    funcIsWaitingLatch.await();

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

  /**
   * Constructs a {@code HashCode} from the {@code Hasher} objects of the functions. Each of them
   * has consumed the entire input and they are ready to output a {@code HashCode}. The order of the
   * hashers are the same order as the functions given to the constructor.
   */
  // this could be cleaner if it passed HashCode[], but that would create yet another array...
  /* protected */ abstract HashCode makeHash(Hasher[] hashers);

  @Override