*
 * **Not all cipher suites are supported on all platforms.** As newer cipher suites are created (for
 * stronger privacy, better performance, etc.) they will be adopted by the platform and then exposed
 * here. Cipher suites that are not available on either Android (through API level 24) or Java
 * (through JDK 9) are omitted for brevity.
 *
 * See [Android SSLEngine][sslengine] which lists the cipher suites supported by Android.
 *

```

</div>

E abra os documentos em <a href="http://127.0.0.1:8000/docs" class="external-link" target="_blank">http://127.0.0.1:8000/docs</a>.

Você verá a documentação automática da API, incluindo os caminhos de todos os submódulos, usando os caminhos (e prefixos) corretos e as tags corretas:

<img src="/img/tutorial/bigger-applications/image01.png">

	case BatchJobExpireObject:
		if obj.DeleteMarker {
			return false
		}
	case BatchJobExpireDeleted:
		if !obj.DeleteMarker {
			return false
		}
	default:
		// we should never come here, Validate should have caught this.
		batchLogOnceIf(context.Background(), fmt.Errorf("invalid filter type: %s", ef.Type), ef.Type)
		return false
	}

	if len(ef.Name) > 0 && !wildcard.Match(ef.Name, obj.Name) {

        return ByteBuffer.allocateDirect(size);
    }
    
    public void releaseBuffer(ByteBuffer buffer) {
        // For direct buffers, we rely on GC
        // Could implement a more sophisticated buffer pool here
    }
    
    public void cleanup() {
        // Clean up all pooled regions
        RdmaMemoryRegion region;
        
        while ((region = availableSendRegions.poll()) != null) {

Here we do it... just to show that we can 🤷:

```Python hl_lines="21-23" title="app/main.py"
{!../../docs_src/bigger_applications/app/main.py!}
```

and it will work correctly, together with all the other *path operations* added with `app.include_router()`.

/// info | Very Technical Details

**Note**: this is a very technical detail that you probably can **just skip**.

   * previously configured separator between each.
   */
  public String join(Iterable<?> parts) {
    // We don't use the same optimization here as in the JRE flavor.
    // TODO: b/381289911 - Evaluate the performance impact of doing so.
    return join(parts.iterator());
  }

  /*

    return stringWriter.toString();
  }

  /**
   * Returns the stack trace of {@code throwable}, possibly providing slower iteration over the full
   * trace but faster iteration over parts of the trace. Here, "slower" and "faster" are defined in
   * comparison to the normal way to access the stack trace, {@link Throwable#getStackTrace()
   * throwable.getStackTrace()}. Note, however, that this method's special implementation is not

            </jdkToolchain>
            <includes>
              <include>${test.include}</include>
            </includes>
            <!-- By having our own entries here, we also override the default exclusion filter, which excludes all nested classes. -->
            <excludes>
              <!-- https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2840 -->

    }
  }

  // TODO(fry): Separate logic for consistency between emul and nonemul implementation.
  // TODO(fry): Look into Maps.KeySet and Maps.Values, which can ideally be reused here but are
  // currently only package visible.
  abstract class AbstractCacheSet<T> extends AbstractSet<T> {
    final ConcurrentMap<?, ?> map;

    AbstractCacheSet(ConcurrentMap<?, ?> map) {
      this.map = map;

      Iterable<? extends IteratorFeature> features,
      Iterable<E> expectedElements,
      KnownOrder knownOrder,
      int startIndex) {
    // periodically we should manually try (steps * 3 / 2) here; all tests but
    // one should still pass (testVerifyGetsCalled()).
    stimuli = (Stimulus<E, ? super I>[]) new Stimulus<?, ?>[steps];
    if (!elementsToInsertIterable.iterator().hasNext()) {