return strings.HasPrefix(r.Header.Get(xhttp.Authorization), jwtAlgorithm)
}

// Verify if request has AWS Signature Version '4'.
func isRequestSignatureV4(r *http.Request) bool {
	return strings.HasPrefix(r.Header.Get(xhttp.Authorization), signV4Algorithm)
}

// Verify if request has AWS Signature Version '2'.
func isRequestSignatureV2(r *http.Request) bool {

dependencies {
  // Everything else requires Android API 21+.
  androidSignature(rootProject.libs.signature.android.apilevel21) { artifact { type = "signature" } }

  // OkHttp requires Java 8+.
  jvmSignature(rootProject.libs.codehaus.signature.java18) { artifact { type = "signature" } }

  checkstyleConfig(rootProject.libs.checkStyle) {
    isTransitive = false
  }
}

If you want to play with JWT tokens and see how they work, check <a href="https://jwt.io/" class="external-link" target="_blank">https://jwt.io</a>.

## Install `PyJWT` { #install-pyjwt }

  ASSERT_EQ(func_->record->fdef().signature().attr().size(), 2);
  EXPECT_EQ(func_->record->fdef().signature().attr(0).name(), "v1");
  EXPECT_EQ(func_->record->fdef().signature().attr(0).type(), "int");
  EXPECT_EQ(func_->record->fdef().signature().attr(1).name(), "v2");
  EXPECT_EQ(func_->record->fdef().signature().attr(1).type(), "int");
}

			fv:   defaultFormVals.Clone().Set(xhttp.AmzSignature, "my-signature"),
		},
		{
			name: "XIgnoreFoo does not have to appear in policy",
			fv:   defaultFormVals.Clone().Set("X-Ignore-Foo", "my-foo-value"),
		},
		{
			name: "File does not have to appear in policy",
			fv:   defaultFormVals.Clone().Set("File", "file-value"),
		},
		{
			name: "Signature does not have to appear in policy",

        // For now, we test that the method signature is correct and can be called

        AtomicInteger callbackCount = new AtomicInteger(0);

        try {
            // This will likely fail due to missing SearchEngineClient setup,
            // but we can verify the method signature and basic functionality
            SearchEngineUtil.scroll("test_index", hit -> {

        // Assert
        assertTrue(result, "Verify should return true for valid signature");
        verify(signingDigest, times(1)).verify(testData, offset, length, extraPad, message);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test verify method returns false for invalid signature")
    void testVerifyReturnsFalse() {
        // Arrange
        int offset = 0;
        int length = testData.length;

    /**
     * Buffer type for credential information.
     */
    int CREDENTIAL_TYPE = 2;
    /**
     * Buffer type for server checksum signature.
     */
    int SERVER_CHECKSUM = 6;
    /**
     * Buffer type for privilege server (KDC) checksum signature.
     */
    int PRIVSVR_CHECKSUM = 7;

    /**
     * Buffer type for client name information.
     */
    int CLIENT_NAME_TYPE = 0xA;
    /**

	if err != nil {
		t.Fatal(err)
	}

        method signatures would look like, for example, even if the method and class names are still
        in flux. This can make the feature you're suggesting much clearer to us.

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: (Optional) What would the method signatures for your feature look like?
      placeholder: |
        e.g.,