reported vulnerability and how it might be exploited. Alternatively,
   a well-established vulnerability identifier, e.g. CVE number, can be
   used instead.

Based on the description mentioned above, a MinIO engineer or security team
member investigates:

- Whether the reported vulnerability exists.
- The conditions that are required such that the vulnerability can be exploited.

    }
    return dummy;
  }

  /**
   * Similar to the above, but keeps a boolean flag rather than checking for the string accumulated
   * so far being empty. As a result, it does not have the above-mentioned bug.
   */
  @Benchmark
  int booleanIfFirst(int reps) {
    int dummy = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {
      StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
      boolean append = false;

 *   <dd>A new type, which is similar to {@link java.util.Map}, but may contain multiple entries
 *       with the same key. Some behaviors of {@link Multimap} are left unspecified and are provided
 *       only by the subtypes mentioned below.
 *   <dt>{@link ListMultimap}
 *   <dd>An extension of {@link Multimap} which permits duplicate entries, supports random access of

 *   <dd>A new type, which is similar to {@link java.util.Map}, but may contain multiple entries
 *       with the same key. Some behaviors of {@link Multimap} are left unspecified and are provided
 *       only by the subtypes mentioned below.
 *   <dt>{@link ListMultimap}
 *   <dd>An extension of {@link Multimap} which permits duplicate entries, supports random access of

| *Required* | *Yes*    |

### AUTHPARAMS

Indicates STS API Authorization information. If you are familiar with AWS Signature V4 Authorization header, this STS API supports signature V4 authorization as mentioned [here](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/general/latest/gr/signature-version-4.html)

### DurationSeconds

start by opening a new issue describing the bug or feature you're intending to
fix. Even if you think it's relatively minor, it's helpful to know what people
are working on. And as mentioned above, API changes should be discussed
thoroughly before moving to code.

Some examples of types of pull requests that are immediately helpful:

  - Fixing a bug without changing a public API.

The command will generate the `scrape_configs` section of the prometheus.yml as follows:

##### Cluster

```yaml
scrape_configs:
- job_name: minio-job
  bearer_token: <secret>

                return props;
            }
        };
        assertEquals(Long.valueOf(-86400000), negativeEnv.getTimeAdjustTimeMillisAsLong());

        // Test large value (one year as mentioned in comment)
        FessEnv.SimpleImpl yearEnv = new FessEnv.SimpleImpl() {
            protected Properties prepareProperties() {
                Properties props = new Properties();

    // we rule out characters that would cause problems in host headers.
    if (c <= '\u001f' || c >= '\u007f') {
      return true
    }
    // Check for the characters mentioned in the WHATWG Host parsing spec:
    // U+0000, U+0009, U+000A, U+000D, U+0020, "#", "%", "/", ":", "?", "@", "[", "\", and "]"
    // (excluding the characters covered above).
    if (" #%/:?@[\\]".indexOf(c) != -1) {

func errorResponseHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
	if r.Method == http.MethodOptions {
		return
	}
	desc := "Do not upgrade one server at a time - please follow the recommended guidelines mentioned here https://github.com/minio/minio#upgrading-minio for your environment"
	switch {
	case strings.HasPrefix(r.URL.Path, peerRESTPrefix):
		writeErrorResponseString(r.Context(), w, APIError{