*   <li>Can be streamed without "breaking the chain": {@code foo.getBarDoubles().stream()...}.
 *   <li>Access to all collection-based utilities via {@link #asList} (though at the cost of
 *       allocating garbage).
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code double[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).

  // Whether and how garbage collection will be performed.
  // Either this field or OrphanDependents may be set, but not both.
  // The default policy is decided by the existing finalizer set in the
  // metadata.finalizers and the resource-specific default policy.
  // Acceptable values are: 'Orphan' - orphan the dependents; 'Background' -
  // allow the garbage collector to delete the dependents in the background;

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Ints.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(int[] array, int distance) {

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Chars.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(char[] array, int distance) {

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Floats.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(float[] array, int distance) {

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Bytes.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(double[] array, int distance) {

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Floats.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(float[] array, int distance) {

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Longs.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(long[] array, int distance) {

   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Longs.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(long[] array, int distance) {

   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> in almost all circumstances, the returned {@link ImmutableList} retains a
   * strong reference to {@code this}, which may prevent the original list from being garbage
   * collected. If you want the original list to be eligible for garbage collection, you should
   * create and use a copy of the sub list (e.g., {@code
   * ImmutableList.copyOf(originalList.subList(...))}).
   */
  @Override