assertTrue(item + " must be equivalent to itself", equivalence.equivalent(item, item));
      assertEquals(
          "the hash of " + item + " must be consistent",
          equivalence.hash(item),
          equivalence.hash(item));
    }
  }

    }
  }

  override fun <T : Any> get(key: KClass<T>): T? =
    when {
      key == this.key -> key.java.cast(value)
      else -> next[key]
    }

  /** Returns a [toString] consistent with [Map], with elements in insertion order. */
  override fun toString(): String =
    generateSequence<LinkedTags<*>>(seed = this) { it.next as? LinkedTags<*> }
      .toList()
      .reversed()

    }

    @Test
    public void test_hashCode() {
        // Test hashCode consistency
        int metadataHashCode = SsoResponseType.METADATA.hashCode();
        int logoutHashCode = SsoResponseType.LOGOUT.hashCode();

        // Hash code should be consistent for the same object
        assertEquals(metadataHashCode, SsoResponseType.METADATA.hashCode());

   * required, to have the following properties:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>Its execution does not cause any observable side effects.
   *   <li>The computation is <i>consistent with equals</i>; that is, {@link Objects#equal
   *       Objects.equal}{@code (a, b)} implies that {@code predicate.apply(a) ==
   *       predicate.apply(b))}.
   * </ul>
   *

        assertNotNull(rp);
        assertEquals(name, rp.name(), "name() must match input");
        assertEquals(name, rp.toString(), "toString() should default to name()");
        // Ordinal is consistent with declaration order
        switch (name) {
        case "NONE":
            assertEquals(0, rp.ordinal());
            break;
        case "NO_TIMEOUT":
            assertEquals(1, rp.ordinal());

 * equality for both keys and values. This may not be the desired behavior for map implementations
 * that use non-standard notions of key equality, such as the entry of a {@code SortedMap} whose
 * comparator is not consistent with {@code equals}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods are not guaranteed to be thread-safe, even when all of the
 * methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Mike Bostock
 * @author Louis Wasserman

   * expected</i>, but not absolutely required, to have the following properties:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>Its execution does not cause any observable side effects.
   *   <li>The computation is <i>consistent with equals</i>; that is, {@link Objects#equals
   *       Objects.equals}{@code (a, b)} implies that {@code Objects.equals(function.apply(a),
   *       function.apply(b))}.
   * </ul>
   *

            // Then
            assertEquals(443, httpsPort);
            assertNotEquals(jcifs.http.Handler.DEFAULT_HTTP_PORT, httpsPort);
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should return consistent port value")
        void testPortConsistency() {
            // When
            int port1 = handler.getDefaultPort();
            int port2 = handler.getDefaultPort();
            int port3 = handler.getDefaultPort();

	if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
		echo "Outputs are consistent."
		break
	fi

	remaining_attempts=$((max_wait_attempts - attempt))
	if ((attempt >= max_wait_attempts)); then
		echo "Outputs remain inconsistent after $max_wait_attempts attempts. Exiting with error."
		exit 1
	else
		echo "Outputs are inconsistent. Waiting for $wait_interval seconds (attempt $attempt/$max_wait_attempts)."

        String result = crawlerEngineClient.toString();
        assertNotNull(result);
    }

    // Test hashCode method
    @Test
    public void test_hashCode() {
        // Test that hashCode returns consistent value
        int hashCode1 = crawlerEngineClient.hashCode();
        int hashCode2 = crawlerEngineClient.hashCode();
        assertEquals(hashCode1, hashCode2);
    }

    // Test equals method
    @Test