// or restricted access to system resources. This is acceptable.
            // We primarily want to ensure the method can be called without compilation errors

            // Log the exception for debugging purposes but don't fail the test
            System.out.println("Expected exception in test environment: " + t.getClass().getSimpleName() + ": " + t.getMessage());

import java.lang.ref.WeakReference;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests of basic {@link LoadingCache} operations with all possible combinations of key & value
 * strengths.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class CacheReferencesTest extends TestCase {

  private static final CacheLoader<Key, String> KEY_TO_STRING_LOADER =

    assertThat(frameLog(true, 3, 10000, TYPE_DATA, 0x20))
      .isEqualTo("<< 0x00000003 10000 DATA          COMPRESSED")
  }

  /**
   * Ensures that valid flag combinations appear visually correct, and invalid show in hex.  This
   * also demonstrates how sparse the lookup table is.
   */
  @Test
  fun allFormattedFlagsWithValidBits() {

/// tip

Notice that the testing functions are normal `def`, not `async def`.

And the calls to the client are also normal calls, not using `await`.

This allows you to use `pytest` directly without complications.

///

/// note | Technical Details

You could also use `from starlette.testclient import TestClient`.

 *
 * <p>This class provides XML merging functionality for Maven's XML handling
 * and specifies the combination modes that control how XML elements are merged.</p>
 *
 * <p>The merger supports two main types of combinations:</p>
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Children combination: Controls how child elements are combined</li>
 *   <li>Self combination: Controls how the element itself is combined</li>
 * </ul>
 *

            throw new AssertionError();
          }
        };
    assertThrows(IllegalStateException.class, iter::hasNext);
  }

  // Technically we should test other reentrant scenarios (4 combinations of
  // hasNext/next), but we'll cop out for now, knowing that
  // next() both start by invoking hasNext() anyway.

          parentBuilder) {
    List<TestSuite> derivedSuites = new ArrayList<>(super.createDerivedSuites(parentBuilder));

    if (!parentBuilder.getFeatures().contains(SUBSET_VIEW)) {
      // Other combinations are inherited from SortedSetTestSuiteBuilder.
      derivedSuites.add(createSubsetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.NO_BOUND, Bound.INCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubsetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.NO_BOUND));

    "groups" : [ {
      "testProject" : "largeJavaMultiProject",
      "comment" : "We only test the multi-project here since for the monolithic project we would have no cache hits. This would mean we actually would test incremental compilation.",
      "coverage" : {
        "per_commit" : [ "linux" ]
      }
    } ]
  }, {

    @DisplayName("Parameterized Tests for Multiple Scenarios")
    class ParameterizedTests {

        @ParameterizedTest
        @MethodSource("provideMechanismCombinations")
        @DisplayName("Various mechanism combinations round-trip correctly")
        void testMechanismCombinations(ASN1ObjectIdentifier[] mechanisms) throws Exception {
            NegTokenInit init = new NegTokenInit(mechanisms, 0, null, null);

    if (!parentBuilder.getFeatures().contains(NoRecurse.DESCENDING)) {
      derivedSuites.add(createDescendingSuite(parentBuilder));
    }

    if (!parentBuilder.getFeatures().contains(NoRecurse.SUBMAP)) {
      // Other combinations are inherited from SortedMapTestSuiteBuilder.
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.NO_BOUND, Bound.INCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.NO_BOUND));