b.mu.Lock()
	c, ok := b.caches[id]
	if ok {
		// Delete from root map.
		list := b.cachesRoot[c.root]
		for i, lid := range list {
			if id == lid {
				list = append(list[:i], list[i+1:]...)
				break
			}
		}
		b.cachesRoot[c.root] = list
		delete(b.caches, id)
		b.updated = true
	}
	b.mu.Unlock()
	if ok {
		c.delete(context.Background())
	}

   * loader of that class from being garbage-collected even if there is a {@link SecurityManager}.
   * The {@link SecurityManager} environment makes such leaks more likely because when you create a
   * {@link URLClassLoader} with a {@link SecurityManager}, the creating code's {@link
   * java.security.AccessControlContext} is captured, and that references the creating code's {@link

  static void awaitWaiting(Thread t) {
    while (true) {
      Thread.State state = t.getState();
      switch (state) {
        case RUNNABLE:
        case BLOCKED:
          Thread.yield();
          break;
        case WAITING:
          return;
        default:
          throw new AssertionError("unexpected state: " + state);
      }
    }
  }

		msg, err := target.toProducerMessage(event)
		if err != nil {
			return err
		}
		msgs = append(msgs, msg)
	}
	return target.producer.SendMessages(msgs)
}

// SendFromStore - reads an event from store and sends it to Kafka.
func (target *KafkaTarget) SendFromStore(key store.Key) (err error) {
	if err = target.init(); err != nil {
		return err
	}
	switch {
	case key.ItemCount == 1:

`SavedModel`) and executes them in parallel on available executors. Running
TensorFlow in a multitenant design mixes the risks described above with the
inherent ones from multitenant configurations. The primary areas of concern are
tenant isolation, resource allocation, model sharing and hardware attacks.

### Tenant isolation

Since any tenants or users providing models, graphs or checkpoints can execute

Yes, MinIO will try to transparently migrate any existing IAM data and either stores
it in plaintext (no KMS) or re-encrypts using the KMS.

> Is this change backward compatible? Will it break my setup?

This change is not backward compatible for all setups. In particular, the native
Hashicorp Vault integration - which has been deprecated already - won't be

        // TODO: we should not modify the underlying model here, but resources should be stored
        // TODO: in a separate field in the project, however, that could break v3 plugins
        MavenProject prj = getMavenProject(nonNull(project, "project"));
        org.apache.maven.model.Resource res = new org.apache.maven.model.Resource(nonNull(resource, "resource"));

            await this._wait(this.typeDelay);
            const percent = Math.round(i / chars.length * 100);
            line.textContent = `${chars.slice(0, i)} ${percent}%`;
			if (percent>progressPercent) {
				break;
			}
        }
    }

    /**
     * Helper function for animation delays, called with `await`.
     * @param {number} time - Timeout, in ms.
     */
    _wait(time) {

                case 2:
                    segmentation = values[1];
                case 1:
                    token = values[0];
                default:
                    break;
                }

                id++;
                final KuromojiItem item = new KuromojiItem(id, token, segmentation, reading, pos);
                if (updater != null) {

      .isEqualTo("abcdefghijklmnopqrst".encodeUtf8())
    assertThat(relay.isClosed).isTrue()
    assertFile(Relay.PREFIX_CLEAN, 20L, metadata.size, "abcdefghijklmnopqrst", metadata)
  }

  /** Returns a callable that reads all of source, closes it, and returns the bytes.  */
  private fun sourceReader(source: Source?): Callable<ByteString> {
    return Callable {
      val buffer = Buffer()
      while (source!!.read(buffer, 16384) != -1L) {