*       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

    }

    @Override
    public <T> T lookup(Class<T> type) {
        return objects.stream()
                .filter(type::isInstance)
                .map(type::cast)
                .findAny()
                .orElseThrow(() -> new LookupException("No service of type " + type));
    }

    @Override
    public <T> T lookup(Class<T> type, String name) {
        return null;
    }

    @Override

labels: ["Proposal", "LanguageChange", "LanguageChangeReview"]
title: "proposal: spec: proposal title"


body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
       ## Our process for evaluating language changes can be found [here](https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/refs/heads/master#language-changes)

  - type: dropdown
    id: author-go-experience
    attributes:
      label: "Go Programming Experience"

    assume().that(graph.incidentEdgeOrder().type()).isEqualTo(ElementOrder.Type.STABLE);

    populateTShapedGraph();

    assertThat(graph.adjacentNodes(1)).containsExactly(2, 4, 3).inOrder();
  }

  @Test
  public void stableIncidentEdgeOrder_predecessors_returnsInConnectingEdgeInsertionOrder() {
    assume().that(graph.incidentEdgeOrder().type()).isEqualTo(ElementOrder.Type.STABLE);

    populateTShapedGraph();

{
    "properties": {
      "thumbnail_id": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "path": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "generator": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "target": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "createdTime": {
        "type": "long"
      },
      "createdBy": {
        "type": "keyword"
      }
    }

                    "required": ["loc", "msg", "type"],
                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {
                        "loc": {
                            "title": "Location",
                            "type": "array",
                            "items": {
                                "anyOf": [{"type": "string"}, {"type": "integer"}]
                            },