* requests which resulted in either successful or failed loading attempts, and requests which
   * waited for other threads to finish loading. It is thus the case that {@code missCount >=
   * loadSuccessCount + loadExceptionCount}. Multiple concurrent misses for the same key will result
   * in a single load operation.
   */
  public double missRate() {

   * write.
   *
   * 2. visibility of the writes to an afterDone() call triggered by cancel():
   *
   * Since these fields are non-final that means that TimeoutFuture is not being 'safely published',
   * thus a motivated caller may be able to expose the reference to another thread that would then
   * call cancel() and be unable to cancel the delegate.

         *
         * We *would* just check such functions redundantly, but kotlinc emits its nullness
         * annotations in the form of JetBrains annotations, which have only class retention and
         * thus are invisible at runtime. Thus, we conclude that the parameter types are
         * *non*-nullable, even when they are declared as `Foo?`.
         */
        || hasAutomaticNullChecksFromKotlin(member);
  }

      }
      /*
       * requireNonNull is safe because:
       *
       * - columnIterator started off pointing to an empty iterator, so we must have entered the
       *   `if` body above at least once. Thus, if we got this far, that `if` body initialized
       *   rowEntry at least once.
       *
       * - The only case in which rowEntry is cleared (during remove() below) happens only if the

   * {@link #testSeededHashFunctionEquals} because the parameter to {@code goodFastHash} is a size,
   * not a seed, and because that size is rounded up. Thus, {@code goodFastHash} instances with
   * different parameters can be equal. That fact is a problem for {@code
   * testSeededHashFunctionEquals}.
   */
  public void testGoodFastHashEquals() throws Exception {

   * returns the elements in the order they are returned by the collection's iterator. The returned
   * array is "safe" in that no references to it are maintained by the collection. The caller is
   * thus free to modify the returned array.
   *
   * <p>This method assumes that the collection size doesn't change while the method is running.
   *
   * <p>TODO(kevinb): support concurrently modified collections?
   *

labels.facet_filetype_scala=Scala
labels.facet_filetype_shell=Script shell
labels.facet_filetype_vb=Visual Basic
labels.facet_filetype_others=Autres
labels.facet_label_reset=Réinitialiser
labels.searchoptions_all=Tous
labels.searchoptions_score=Score
labels.searchoptions_menu_sort=Trier
labels.searchoptions_menu_num=Nombre
labels.searchoptions_num={0} résultats
labels.searchoptions_menu_lang=Langue

   * in no particular order.
   *
   * <p>The returned array will be "safe" in that no references to it are maintained by this queue.
   * (In other words, this method must allocate a new array). The caller is thus free to modify the
   * returned array.
   *
   * <p>This method acts as bridge between array-based and collection-based APIs.
   *
   * @return an array containing all of the elements in this queue
   */

    // we need to keep this in a flag because t.isInterrupted() returns false after t.join()
    AtomicBoolean interrupted = new AtomicBoolean();
    // we need to use another thread because it will be interrupted and thus using
    // the current one, owned by JUnit, would make the test fail
    Thread thread =
        new Thread(
            new Runnable() {
              @Override
              public void run() {

         Module Metadata hides the dependency declared in `guava` from runtime
         configurations downstream, and GWT uses the runtime configuration for
         its builds. Thus, GWT doesn't get j2objc-annotations transitively, in
         contrast to the other deps of `guava`, which it does get transitively.
         (Arguably we should redeclare *all* the `guava` deps here.) -->
    <dependency>