import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Microbenchmark for {@link Splitter#on} with char vs String with length == 1.
 *
 * @author Paul Lindner
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class SplitterBenchmark {
  // overall size of string
  @Param({"1", "10", "100", "1000"})
  int length;

  // Number of matching strings
  @Param({"xxxx", "xxXx", "xXxX", "XXXX"})
  String text;

  private String input;

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: orthogonality
    attributes:
      label: "Orthogonality: How does this change interact or overlap with existing features?"
      description: "Is the goal of this change a performance improvement? If so, what quantifiable improvement should we expect? How would we measure it?"
    validations:
      required: false

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("send(Request, varargs) delegates with null response")
    void sendWithRequestVarargsDelegates() throws Exception {
        // Verifies Request<T> overload forwards to the varargs form with a null response
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
        Request<CommonServerMessageBlockResponse> req = mock(Request.class);

   * Overlapping ranges and empty ranges are forbidden, though adjacent ranges are permitted and
   * will be merged.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if any ranges overlap or are empty
   * @since 21.0
   */
  public static <C extends Comparable<?>> ImmutableRangeSet<C> copyOf(Iterable<Range<C>> ranges) {
    return new ImmutableRangeSet.Builder<C>().addAll(ranges).build();
  }

      boolean anyOverlaps = false;
      for (Range<Integer> range : subset) {
        boolean overlaps = false;
        for (Range<Integer> other : mutable.asRanges()) {
          if (other.isConnected(range) && !other.intersection(range).isEmpty()) {
            overlaps = true;
            anyOverlaps = true;
            break;
          }
        }

        try {

  }

  static void clearInterrupt() {
    Thread.interrupted();
  }

  /**
   * Retrieves the result of a {@code Future} known to be done but uses the {@code get(long,
   * TimeUnit)} overload in order to test that method.
   */
  static <V extends @Nullable Object> V getDoneFromTimeoutOverload(Future<V> future)
      throws ExecutionException {

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Microbenchmark for {@link Splitter#on} with char vs String with length == 1.
 *
 * @author Paul Lindner
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class SplitterBenchmark {
  // overall size of string
  @Param({"1", "10", "100", "1000"})
  int length;

  // Number of matching strings
  @Param({"xxxx", "xxXx", "xXxX", "XXXX"})
  String text;

  private String input;

        SmbResourceLocatorImpl child = locator("smb://server/share/dir/file");
        assertTrue(base.overlaps(child));

        SmbResourceLocatorImpl other = locator("smb://server/share/other");
        assertFalse(base.overlaps(other));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("isRoot and isRootOrShare reflect path state")
    void testIsRootAndShare() {

	return rs.ReplicaStatus == o.ReplicaStatus &&
		rs.ReplicationStatusInternal == o.ReplicationStatusInternal &&
		rs.VersionPurgeStatusInternal == o.VersionPurgeStatusInternal
}

// CompositeReplicationStatus returns overall replication status for the object version being replicated.
func (rs *ReplicationState) CompositeReplicationStatus() (st replication.StatusType) {
	switch {
	case rs.ReplicationStatusInternal != "":

Also, the best approach was to use already existing standards.

So, before even starting to code **FastAPI**, I spent several months studying the specs for OpenAPI, JSON Schema, OAuth2, etc. Understanding their relationship, overlap, and differences.

## Design { #design }

Then I spent some time designing the developer "API" I wanted to have as a user (as a developer using FastAPI).