}

    /**
     * Test that insufficient buffer size is properly detected.
     */
    @Test
    public void testInsufficientBufferSize() {
        byte[] tooSmallBuffer = new byte[32]; // Much smaller than required 65 bytes

        SMBProtocolDecodingException exception = assertThrows(SMBProtocolDecodingException.class, () -> {
            response.readBytesWireFormat(tooSmallBuffer, 0);
        });

 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashMap}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger
 * than {@code size()}. Furthermore, this structure places significantly reduced load on the garbage
 * collector by only using a constant number of internal objects.
 *

   * byte array {@code {0x12, 0x13, 0x14, 0x15, 0x33}} would yield the {@code int} value {@code
   * 0x12131415}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 4 elements
   */
  public static int fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

    checkState(boxedBoolean.booleanValue(), "", s);
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester
  public void testNullPointers() {
    /*
     * Don't bother testing: Preconditions defines a bunch of methods that accept a template (or
     * even entire message) that simultaneously:
     *
     * - _shouldn't_ be null, so we don't annotate it with @Nullable
     *

    assertThat((long) arraysDim1 * arraysDim2).isNotEqualTo((long) (arraysDim1 * arraysDim2));

    byte[][] arrays = new byte[arraysDim1][];
    // it's shared to avoid using too much memory in tests
    byte[] sharedArray = new byte[arraysDim2];
    Arrays.fill(arrays, sharedArray);

    try {
      Bytes.concat(arrays);
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {

   *
   * <p><i>Performance notes:</i> while the cartesian product of lists of size {@code m, n, p} is a
   * list of size {@code m x n x p}, its actual memory consumption is much smaller. When the
   * cartesian product is constructed, the input lists are merely copied. Only as the resulting list
   * is iterated are the individual lists created, and these are not retained after iteration.
   *

    assertThrows(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> iia3.subArray(1, 4));
  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {

 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashMap}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger
 * than {@code size()}. Furthermore, this structure places significantly reduced load on the garbage
 * collector by only using a constant number of internal objects.
 *

   * ```
   *
   * But this chain is wrong because the attackerSwitch certificate is being used in a CA role even
   * though it is not a CA certificate. There are pinned certificates in the chain! The correct
   * chain is much shorter because it skips the non-CA certificate.
   *
   * ```
   *   attackerCa
   *     -> attackerIntermediate
   *         -> phonyVictim
   * ```
   *

 * }
 *
 * <h3>Comparison to alternatives</h3>
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> In some cases the differences explained below can be subtle. When it's unclear
 * which approach to use, <b>don't worry</b> too much about it; just pick something that seems
 * reasonable and it will be fine.
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>If checking whether the <i>caller</i> has violated your method or constructor's contract