The most common is the implicit flow.

The most secure is the code flow, but it's more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

/// note

It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

Elas tendem a exigir configurações mais complexas, um gerenciador de fila de mensagens/tarefas, como RabbitMQ ou Redis, mas permitem executar tarefas em segundo plano em vários processos e, especialmente, em vários servidores.

        KerberosKey kdcKey = new KerberosKey(null, keyBytes, PacSignature.HMAC_SHA1_96_AES256, 1);
        keys.put(PacSignature.ETYPE_AES256_CTS_HMAC_SHA1_96, kdcKey);

        // Mock Pac construction to bypass complex validation
        try (MockedConstruction<Pac> pacMock = Mockito.mockConstruction(Pac.class, (mock, context) -> {
            // Setup mock behavior
            PacLogonInfo mockLogonInfo = Mockito.mock(PacLogonInfo.class);

        void shouldHandleResponseMapOperations() {
            assertEquals(0, transport.getResponseMapSize());
            // Response map is accessible through protected field for testing
            // but we avoid complex interactions here for performance
        }
    }

    assertFalse(set.equals(newHashSet(4, 5, 6)));
    assertFalse(newHashSet(4, 5, 6).equals(set));

    Set<String> complex = Sets.newTreeSet(STRING_LENGTH);
    Collections.addAll(complex, "in", "the", "a");
    assertEquals(set, complex);
  }

  public void testEquals_bothDefaultOrdering_stringVsInt() {
    SortedSet<String> set = of("a", "b", "c");

            // Verify overwrite
            assertEquals(concreteImplementation, cacheMap.get(key));
            assertNotEquals(oldEntry, cacheMap.get(key));
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Complex Scenarios Tests")
    class ComplexScenariosTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle multiple fixup operations")
        void testMultipleFixupOperations() {

 *       MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator}.
 *   <li>If you manually call {@link java.util.concurrent.FutureTask#set} or a similar method,
 *       create a {@link SettableFuture} instead. (If your needs are more complex, you may prefer
 *       {@link AbstractFuture}.)
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Test doubles</b>: If you need a {@code ListenableFuture} for your test, try a {@link

		t.Fatalf("failed to query data, got error %v", err)
	}
	AssertEqual(t, result, out)

	// update record
	data.Roles = append(data.Roles, "r3")
	data.JobInfo.Location = "Gates Hillman Complex"
	if err := DB.Assign(data).FirstOrCreate(&out).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("failed to FirstOrCreate Assigned data, got error %v", err)
	}
	if err := DB.First(&result, out.ID).Error; err != nil {

Envoyer un corps dans une requête `GET` a un comportement non défini dans les spécifications, cela est néanmoins supporté par **FastAPI**, seulement pour des cas d'utilisation très complexes/extrêmes.

Ceci étant découragé, la documentation interactive générée par Swagger UI ne montrera pas de documentation pour le corps d'une requête `GET`, et les proxys intermédiaires risquent de ne pas le supporter.

///

        String result = queue.toString();
        assertNotNull(result);
        assertTrue(result.contains("UrlQueueImpl"));
    }

    public void test_complexScenario() {
        // Test complex scenario with all fields
        UrlQueueImpl<Long> queue = new UrlQueueImpl<>();

        Long id = 999L;
        String sessionId = "crawl-session-123";
        String method = "POST";