During local development, there is a script that builds the site and checks for any changes, live-reloading:

<div class="termy">

```console
$ python ./scripts/docs.py live

<span style="color: green;">[INFO]</span> Serving on http://127.0.0.1:8008
<span style="color: green;">[INFO]</span> Start watching changes
<span style="color: green;">[INFO]</span> Start detecting changes
```

</div>

**The Elasticsearch build will fail if any deprecated Gradle API is used.**

### Make a change in the build

There are a few guidelines to follow that should make your life easier to make changes to the elasticsearch build.
Please add a member of the `es-delivery` team as a reviewer if you're making non-trivial changes to the build.

#### Custom Plugin and Task implementations

========== // The implementations for gcmHash and gcmInit are based on the generated asm // from the script https://github.com/dot-asm/cryptogams/blob/master/ppc/ghashp8-ppc.pl // from commit d47afb3c. // Changes were made due to differences in the ABI and some register usage. // Some arguments were changed due to the way the Go code passes them. // Portions that use the stitched AES-GCM approach in counterCryptASM // are based on code found in // https://github.com/IBM/ipcri/blob/main/aes/p10_aes_gcm.s...

    assertThat(emptyGraph.allowsSelfLoops()).isTrue();
    assertThat(emptyGraph.nodeOrder()).isEqualTo(ElementOrder.<String>natural());
  }

  /**
   * Tests that the ImmutableGraph.Builder doesn't change when the creating GraphBuilder changes.
   */
  @Test
  @SuppressWarnings("CheckReturnValue")
  public void immutableGraphBuilder_copiesGraphBuilder() {
    GraphBuilder<String> graphBuilder =
        GraphBuilder.directed()

   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>We could change the serialization of this class incompatibly. We have reserved the right
   *       to make such changes to our serialized forms, and we have made them before, usually
   *       without trouble. In this case, my guess is that our chosen approach is even less likely
   *       to lead to trouble than an incompatible change would be.

   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>We could change the serialization of this class incompatibly. We have reserved the right
   *       to make such changes to our serialized forms, and we have made them before, usually
   *       without trouble. In this case, my guess is that our chosen approach is even less likely
   *       to lead to trouble than an incompatible change would be.

      value: >
        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the

-   [guava-announce: Announcements of releases and upcoming significant changes](https://groups.google.com/group/guava-announce)
-   [guava-discuss: For open-ended questions and discussion](https://groups.google.com/group/guava-discuss)

## IMPORTANT WARNINGS

1.  APIs marked with the `@Beta` annotation at the class or method level are
    subject to change. They can be modified in any way, or even removed, at any

2. **Thoughtful, honest feedback.** We will consider every contribution on its merits, regardless of whether AI was used. We may not respond quickly—our review queue is long—but we will tell you clearly what works, what needs to change, and why.

                      'incubating': incubatingInterface]
    }

    def "#member change should not be reported"() {
        expect:
        noViolation(rule)

        where:
        member << [Mock(JApiMethod), Mock(JApiField), Mock(JApiImplementedInterface), Mock(JApiConstructor)]
    }

    def "nothing should be reported if no changes"() {
        expect:
        noViolation(rule)
    }