```

그 다음, 다음과 같이 호출합니다:

```Python
user_dict = user_in.dict()
```

이제 변수 `user_dict`에 데이터가 포함된 `dict`를 가지게 됩니다(이는 Pydantic 모델 객체가 아닌 `dict`입니다).

그리고 다음과 같이 호출하면:

```Python
print(user_dict)
```

Python의 `dict`가 다음과 같이 출력됩니다:

```Python
{
    'username': 'john',
    'password': 'secret',
    'email': '******@****.***',
    'full_name': None,
}
```

////

## 在 Python 中读取环境变量

你也可以在 Python **之外**的终端中创建环境变量（或使用任何其他方法），然后在 Python 中**读取**它们。

例如，你可以创建一个名为 `main.py` 的文件，其中包含以下内容：

```Python hl_lines="3"
import os

name = os.getenv("MY_NAME", "World")
print(f"Hello {name} from Python")
```

/// tip

第二个参数是 <a href="https://docs.python.org/zh-cn/3.8/library/os.html#os.getenv" class="external-link" target="_blank">`os.getenv()`</a> 的默认返回值。

```

そして呼び出すと:

```Python
user_dict = user_in.dict()
```

これで変数`user_dict`のデータを持つ`dict`ができました。（これはPydanticモデルのオブジェクトの代わりに`dict`です）。

そして呼び出すと:

```Python
print(user_dict)
```

以下のようなPythonの`dict`を得ることができます:

```Python
{
    'username': 'john',
    'password': 'secret',
    'email': '******@****.***',
    'full_name': None,
}
```

in TensorFlow ops can be recognized as security issues only if they are
reachable and exploitable through production-grade, benign models.

### Compilation

Compiling models via the recommended entry points described in
[XLA](https://www.tensorflow.org/xla) and
[JAX](https://jax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/jax-101/02-jitting.html)
documentation should be safe, while some of the testing and debugging tools that

////

## 在 Python 中讀取環境變數

你也可以在 Python **之外**的終端機中建立環境變數（或使用其他方法），然後在 Python 中**讀取**它們。

例如，你可以建立一個名為 `main.py` 的檔案，其中包含以下內容：

```Python hl_lines="3"
import os

name = os.getenv("MY_NAME", "World")
print(f"Hello {name} from Python")
```

/// tip

第二個參數是 <a href="https://docs.python.org/zh-tw/3.8/library/os.html#os.getenv" class="external-link" target="_blank">`os.getenv()`</a> 的預設回傳值。

	"internal/buildcfg"
	"os"
	"path/filepath"
	"regexp"
	"sort"
	"strconv"
	"strings"
	"testing"

	"cmd/asm/internal/lex"
	"cmd/internal/obj"
)

// An end-to-end test for the assembler: Do we print what we parse?
// Output is generated by, in effect, turning on -S and comparing the
// result against a golden file.

func testEndToEnd(t *testing.T, goarch, file string) {
	input := filepath.Join("testdata", file+".s")

GOLANGCI_DIR = .bin/golangci/$(GOLANGCI_VERSION)
GOLANGCI = $(GOLANGCI_DIR)/golangci-lint

all: build

checks: ## check dependencies
	@echo "Checking dependencies"
	@(env bash $(PWD)/buildscripts/checkdeps.sh)

help: ## print this help
	@grep -E '^[a-zA-Z_-]+:.*?## .*$$' Makefile | awk 'BEGIN {FS = ":.*?## "}; {printf "\033[36m%-40s\033[0m %s\n", $$1, $$2}'

getdeps: ## fetch necessary dependencies
	@mkdir -p ${GOPATH}/bin

```Python
with open("./somefile.txt") as f:
    contents = f.read()
    print(contents)
```

Под капотом вызов `open("./somefile.txt")` создаёт объект, называемый «контекстным менеджером».

Когда блок `with` завершается, он обязательно закрывает файл, даже если были исключения.

and then replaces each occurrence of a type C.xxx with _C_xxx.

If xxx is data, cgo arranges for C.xxx to refer to the C variable,
with the type translated as described above.  To do this, cgo must
introduce a Go variable that points at the C variable (the linker can
be told to initialize this pointer).  For example, if the gmp library
provided

	mpz_t zero;

then cgo would rewrite a reference to C.zero by introducing

	var _C_zero *C.mpz_t

                artifactRequest.setRepositories(RepositoryUtils.toRepos(remoteRepositories));

                // Maven 2.x quirk: an artifact always points at the local repo, regardless whether resolved or not
                LocalRepositoryManager lrm = session.getLocalRepositoryManager();
                String path = lrm.getPathForLocalArtifact(artifactRequest.getArtifact());