* code would be responsible for populating a "real" {@code T} (which might still be the value
   * {@code null}!) before returning it to callers. Depending on how the code is structured, a
   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem
   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *

 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?
 *   <li>While a dependency on Android ought to be easy if it's for annotations only, it will
 *       probably require adding the dep to various ACLs, license files, and Proguard

This includes work such as compiling, testing and documenting software, plus sharing that software via publishing and dependency management.
This platform is agnostic to what kind of software is being developed.
It might be Java or Kotlin libraries running on the JVM, Gradle plugins, Android or iOS applications, C++ libraries, and so on.

        // ask ':tooling-api:publishGradleDistributionPublicationToRemoteRepository' uses this output of task ':tooling-api:signLocalPublication'
        // without declaring an explicit or implicit dependency. This can lead to incorrect results being produced, depending on what order the tasks are executed.
        tasks.named("publishGradleDistributionPublicationToRemoteRepository") {
            dependsOn("signLocalPublication")
        }

        println("Deployed ${file.name}")
      }
    } catch (e: IllegalArgumentException) {
      if ("Jar does not have a symbolic name" in e.message!!) {
        println("Skipped non-OSGi dependency: ${file.name}")
        return
      }
      throw e
    }
  }

  companion object {
    val fileSystem = FileSystem.SYSTEM

/// tip | "Dica"

Note que nós estamos utilizando async/await com o novo `AsyncClient` - a requisição é assíncrona.

///

/// warning | "Aviso"

   * same value those two ranges will be coalesced.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> coalescing requires calling {@code .equals()} on any connected values, which
   * may be expensive depending on the value type. Using this method on range maps with large values
   * such as {@link Collection} types is discouraged.
   *
   * @since 22.0
   */
  void putCoalescing(Range<K> range, V value);

   ({{{./maven-core/xref/org/apache/maven/model/plugin/DefaultLifecycleBindingsInjector.html}source}})

   ** dependency management import (for dependencies of type <<<pom>>> and scope <<<import>>> in the <<<\<dependencyManagement\>>>> section)

   ** dependency management injection: <<<DependencyManagementInjector>>> ({{{./apidocs/org/apache/maven/model/management/DependencyManagementInjector.html}javadoc}}),

import org.apache.maven.artifact.versioning.InvalidVersionSpecificationException;
import org.apache.maven.artifact.versioning.VersionRange;
import org.apache.maven.model.Dependency;
import org.apache.maven.model.Exclusion;
import org.apache.maven.model.Plugin;
import org.apache.maven.model.Repository;
import org.apache.maven.model.RepositoryPolicy;

  @CheckForNull
  V forcePut(@ParametricNullness K key, @ParametricNullness V value);

  // Bulk Operations

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> the results of calling this method may vary depending on the iteration order
   * of {@code map}.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if an attempt to {@code put} any entry fails. Note that some