for (int j = i + 1; j < events.length; j++) {
                assertNotEquals(events[i].getValue(), events[j].getValue(),
                        "Event types " + events[i] + " and " + events[j] + " have the same value");
            }
        }
    }

    @Test
    void testWitnessRegistrationStates() {
        assertEquals(5, WitnessRegistration.WitnessRegistrationState.values().length);

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.mockito.MockitoAnnotations;

/**
 * Unit tests for the {@link TransWaitNamedPipe} transaction.
 * The transaction is package private, so the test class lives in the
 * same package to access its fields.
 */
public class TransWaitNamedPipeTest {

    @BeforeEach
    public void setUp() {
        MockitoAnnotations.openMocks(this);
    }

    @Test

        // Test hashCode consistency
        int metadataHashCode = SsoResponseType.METADATA.hashCode();
        int logoutHashCode = SsoResponseType.LOGOUT.hashCode();

        // Hash code should be consistent for the same object
        assertEquals(metadataHashCode, SsoResponseType.METADATA.hashCode());
        assertEquals(logoutHashCode, SsoResponseType.LOGOUT.hashCode());

     */
    public String errorLog;

    /**
     * The number of times this URL has failed.
     * This is a required field that tracks repeated failures for the same URL.
     */
    @Required
    @ValidateTypeFailure
    public String errorCount;

    /**
     * The timestamp of the last access attempt for this URL.

	echo "Remove the contents of the disks belonging to '${1}' erasure set"

	rm -rf ${WORK_DIR}/${1}/*/

	set -x
	start_minio_3_node $2
}

function main() {
	# use same ports for all tests
	start_port=$(shuf -i 10000-65000 -n 1)

	perform_test "2" ${start_port}
	perform_test "1" ${start_port}
	perform_test "3" ${start_port}
}

(__init__ "$@" && main "$@")
rv=$?

      ImmutableList<T> group = groups.get(groupNumber);
      for (int itemNumber = 0; itemNumber < group.size(); itemNumber++) {
        // check related items in same group
        for (int relatedItemNumber = 0; relatedItemNumber < group.size(); relatedItemNumber++) {
          if (itemNumber != relatedItemNumber) {
            assertRelated(groupNumber, itemNumber, relatedItemNumber);

        PacUnicodeString pacString = new PacUnicodeString((short) 10, (short) 20, 100);
        String testString = "abcde";

        // The check method should return the same string instance
        String result = pacString.check(testString);
        assertSame(testString, result, "The check method should return the original string on success.");
    }

    /**

        assertFalse(map.containsKey("maven-test:t09-c"), "maven-test:t09-c is in the project");
    }

    /**
     * Setup exactly the same as the above test, except that the child project
     * now depends upon d, which has a transitive dependency on c.  Even though
     * we did list an exclusion on c, it was only from within the context of

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},