change unified the key-management aspect within MinIO.

The unified KMS-based approach has several advantages:

- Key management is now centralized. There is one way to change or rotate encryption keys.
   There used to be two different mechanisms - one for regular S3 objects and one for IAM data.
- Reduced server startup time. For IAM encryption with the root credentials, MinIO had

  // +optional
  optional string signerName = 7;

  // expirationSeconds is the requested duration of validity of the issued
  // certificate. The certificate signer may issue a certificate with a different
  // validity duration so a client must check the delta between the notBefore and
  // and notAfter fields in the issued certificate to determine the actual duration.
  //

    #    Other properties (for Application Behavior) work when this is true.
    #   o libraryProjectPackageBase: (NotRequired - Default same as application's one)
    #    If application package base is different from library's one,
    #    set the property a value 'library's one'.
    #
    #; applicationBehaviorMap = map:{
    #    ; isApplicationBehaviorProject = false
    #    ; libraryProjectPackageBase = 
    #}

        "multiset.entrySet.retainAll(missingEntry) returned true",
        getMultiset().entrySet().retainAll(singleton(Multisets.immutableEntry(e0(), 2))));
    assertFalse(
        "multiset contains element after retaining a different entry",
        getMultiset().contains(e0()));
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(SEVERAL)
  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  @MultisetFeature.Require(ENTRIES_ARE_VIEWS)

        buffer.add(e);
        added++;
      }
    }
    return added;
  }

  /**
   * Drains the queue as {@linkplain #drain(BlockingQueue, Collection, int, Duration)}, but with a
   * different behavior in case it is interrupted while waiting. In that case, the operation will
   * continue as usual, and in the end the thread's interruption status will be set (no {@code
   * InterruptedException} is thrown).
   *

  /**
   * This is a less carefully-controlled version of {@link #testRemovalNotification_clear} - this is
   * a black-box test that tries to create lots of different thread-interleavings, and asserts that
   * each computation is affected by a call to {@code clear()} (and therefore gets passed to the

 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have
 * released multiple ListenableFuture.class files that are not byte-for-byte compatible even from
 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *
 * (We could consider releasing a listenablefuture:1.0.1 someday. But we would want to look into how

         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {
          validClasses.clear();
        }

        validClasses.add(new WeakReference<Class<? extends Exception>>(exceptionClass));
      }

 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have
 * released multiple ListenableFuture.class files that are not byte-for-byte compatible even from
 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *
 * (We could consider releasing a listenablefuture:1.0.1 someday. But we would want to look into how

```

////

## Recap

Use multiple Pydantic models and inherit freely for each case.