Set<C> columnSpaceBuilder = new LinkedHashSet<>();
    ImmutableList<Cell<R, C, V>> cellList = ImmutableList.copyOf(cells);
    for (Cell<R, C, V> cell : cells) {
      rowSpaceBuilder.add(cell.getRowKey());
      columnSpaceBuilder.add(cell.getColumnKey());
    }

    ImmutableSet<R> rowSpace =
        (rowComparator == null)
            ? ImmutableSet.copyOf(rowSpaceBuilder)

      "username",
      "password".toCharArray(),
    ),
) : Authenticator() {
  val calls = mutableListOf<String>()

  override fun getPasswordAuthentication(): PasswordAuthentication? {
    calls.add(
      "host=$requestingHost port=$requestingPort site=${requestingSite.hostName} " +
        "url=$requestingURL type=$requestorType prompt=$requestingPrompt " +
        "protocol=$requestingProtocol scheme=$requestingScheme",

# Note: We intentionally don't add the flags we'd need to make Flags and Enums
# work. That's because the Proguard configuration required to make them work on
# optimized code would preclude lots of optimization, like converting enums
# into ints.

# Throwables uses internal APIs for lazy stack trace resolution
-dontnote sun.misc.SharedSecrets
-keep class sun.misc.SharedSecrets {
  *** getJavaLangAccess(...);
}
-dontnote sun.misc.JavaLangAccess

  @Test fun connectExceptionsAreReturnedAsSuppressed() {
    val proxySelector = RecordingProxySelector()
    proxySelector.proxies.add(Proxy(Proxy.Type.HTTP, TestUtil.UNREACHABLE_ADDRESS_IPV4))
    proxySelector.proxies.add(Proxy.NO_PROXY)
    server.close()

    client =
      client
        .newBuilder()
        .proxySelector(proxySelector)

- Add driver-owned fields in ResourceSlice to mark whether the device is shareable among multiple resource claims (or requests) and to specify how each capacity can be shared between different requests.
  - Add user-owned fields in ResourceClaim to specify resource requirements against each device capacity.

            if (jsonParser.getCurrentToken() == JsonToken.START_OBJECT) {
                list.add(parseObject(jsonParser));
            } else if (jsonParser.getCurrentToken() == JsonToken.START_ARRAY) {
                list.add(parseArray(jsonParser)); // Nested array
            } else {
                list.add(parsePrimitive(jsonParser));
            }
        }

        return list;
    }

    /**

 * @author Cliff Biffle
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class StringCatcher {
  private final List<String> events = new ArrayList<>();

  @Subscribe
  public void hereHaveAString(@Nullable String string) {
    events.add(string);
  }

  public void methodWithoutAnnotation(@Nullable String string) {
    Assert.fail("Event bus must not call methods without @Subscribe!");
  }

  public List<String> getEvents() {
    return events;

 * {@code asMap} has a few subtleties. As long as the set of keys remains unchanged, adding or
 * removing mappings does not affect the key iteration order. However, if you remove all values
 * associated with a key and then add the key back to the multimap, that key will come last in the
 * key iteration order.
 *
 * <p>The multimap does not store duplicate key-value pairs. Adding a new key-value pair equal to an
 * existing key-value pair has no effect.

    @Override public Response intercept(Chain chain) throws IOException {
      Request request = chain.request();
      Headers newHeaders = request.headers()
          .newBuilder()
          .add("Date", new Date())
          .build();
      Request newRequest = request.newBuilder()
          .headers(newHeaders)
          .build();
      return chain.proceed(newRequest);
    }
  }

            for (final RequestParameter param : searchParameters) {
                for (final String value : param.getValues()) {
                    paramList.add(param.getName());
                    paramList.add(URLEncoder.encode(value, Constants.CHARSET_UTF_8));
                }
            }
            if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {