try {
        checkCurrentState(RUNNING);
      } finally {
        monitor.leave();
      }
    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead

   * {@code co.uk}, {@code google.invalid}, or {@code blogspot.com}.
   *
   * <p>This method can be used to determine whether it will probably be possible to set cookies on
   * the domain, though even that depends on individual browsers' implementations of cookie
   * controls. See <a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2109.txt">RFC 2109</a> for details.
   *
   * @since 6.0
   */

  /** Returns true if this adapter can read [header] in a choice. */
  fun matches(header: DerHeader): Boolean

  /**
   * Returns a value from this adapter.
   *
   * This must always return a value, though it doesn't necessarily need to consume data from
   * [reader]. For example, if the reader's peeked tag isn't readable by this adapter, it may return
   * a default value.
   *

 *
 * <p>The {@link #get}, {@link #removeAll}, and {@link #replaceValues} methods each return a {@link
 * SortedSet} of values, while {@link Multimap#entries()} returns a {@link Set} of map entries.
 * Though the method signature doesn't say so explicitly, the map returned by {@link #asMap} has
 * {@code SortedSet} values.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> As in all {@link SetMultimap}s, do not modify either a key <i>or a value</i>

        .suppressing(suppressForLinkedBlockingQueue())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  // Not specifying KNOWN_ORDER for PriorityQueue and PriorityBlockingQueue
  // even though they do have it, because our tests interpret KNOWN_ORDER to
  // also mean that the iterator returns the head element first, which those
  // don't.

  public Test testsForPriorityBlockingQueue() {

    Object writeReplace() {
    return new SerializedForm<V>(map);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible
  @J2ktIncompatible
  /*
   * The mainline copy of ImmutableMapValues doesn't produce this serialized form anymore, though
   * the backport does. For now, we're keeping the class declaration in *both* flavors so that both
   * flavors can read old data or data from the other flavor. However, we strongly discourage

     * checked against the inputs under Bash in order to confirm that the two
     * forms are equivalent (though not necessarily minimal, though we hope this
     * to be the case). Thus, this test is more of a regression test.
     *
     * Rough instructions to regenerate the test outputs and verify correctness:
     * - Temporarily change this test:
     * --- Comment out assertEquals.

    assertThat(dispatchedSubscribers)
        .containsExactly(
            i1,
            i2,
            i3, // Integer subscribers are dispatched to first.
            s1,
            s2, // Though each integer subscriber dispatches to all string subscribers,
            s1,
            s2, // those string subscribers aren't actually dispatched to until all integer
            s1,

 *       value" (present in the map, with value {@code Optional.absent()})
 *   <li>To wrap nullable references for storage in a collection that does not support {@code null}
 *       (though there are <a
 *       href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/LivingWithNullHostileCollections">several other
 *       approaches to this</a> that should be considered first)
 * </ul>
 *

      try {
        checkCurrentState(RUNNING);
      } finally {
        monitor.leave();
      }
    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead