assertThat(networkAsMutableNetwork.removeNode(N1)).isTrue();

    // The choice of the size() method to call here is arbitrary.  We assume that if any of the Set
    // methods executes the validation check, they all will, and thus we only need to test one of
    // them to ensure that the validation check happens and has the expected behavior.
    assertNodeRemovedFromGraphErrorMessage(

    assertNull(q.peek());
    assertInterruptibleDrained(q);
    assertUninterruptibleDrained(q);
  }

  private void assertInterruptibleDrained(BlockingQueue<Object> q) {
    // nothing to drain, thus this should wait doing nothing
    try {
      assertEquals(0, Queues.drain(q, ImmutableList.of(), 0, 10, MILLISECONDS));
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
      throw new AssertionError();
    }

   * returns the elements in the order they are returned by the collection's iterator. The returned
   * array is "safe" in that no references to it are maintained by the collection. The caller is
   * thus free to modify the returned array.
   *
   * <p>This method assumes that the collection size doesn't change while the method is running.
   *
   * <p>TODO(kevinb): support concurrently modified collections?
   *

   * AbstractFutureState's private fields. However, our open-source build uses `-source 8 -target
   * 8`, so the class files from that build can't express nestmates. Thus, when those class files
   * are used from Java 9 or higher (i.e., high enough to trigger the VarHandle code path), such a
   * lookup would fail with an IllegalAccessException. That may then trigger use of Unsafe (possibly

 */
internal class DerReader(
  source: Source,
) {
  private val countingSource: CountingSource = CountingSource(source)
  private val source: BufferedSource = countingSource.buffer()

  /** Total bytes read thus far. */
  private val byteCount: Long
    get() = countingSource.bytesRead - source.buffer.size

  /** How many bytes to read before [peekHeader] should return false, or -1L for no limit. */
  private var limit = -1L

   * this address.
   *
   * If [planToReplace] is non-null, this will swap it for a pooled connection if that pooled
   * connection uses HTTP/2. That results in fewer sockets overall and thus fewer TCP slow starts.
   */
  internal fun planReusePooledConnection(
    planToReplace: ConnectPlan? = null,
    routes: List<Route>? = null,
  ): ReusePlan? {
    val result =

  }

  /**
   * Returns a new {@code MutableClassToInstanceMap} instance backed by a given empty {@code
   * backingMap}. The caller surrenders control of the backing map, and thus should not allow any
   * direct references to it to remain accessible.
   */
  public static <B extends @Nullable Object> MutableClassToInstanceMap<B> create(
      Map<Class<? extends @NonNull B>, B> backingMap) {

   *       take each of the servers offline, {@code consistentHash} will be a poor fit: It provides
   *       no way for you to specify which of the three buckets is disappearing. Thus, if your
   *       buckets change from {@code [alpha, bravo, charlie]} to {@code [bravo, charlie]}, it will
   *       assign all the old {@code alpha} traffic to {@code bravo} and all the old {@code bravo}

   * AbstractFutureState's private fields. However, our open-source build uses `-source 8 -target
   * 8`, so the class files from that build can't express nestmates. Thus, when those class files
   * are used from Java 9 or higher (i.e., high enough to trigger the VarHandle code path), such a
   * lookup would fail with an IllegalAccessException. That may then trigger use of Unsafe (possibly

   * Table entries are of class Cell; a variant of AtomicLong padded
   * to reduce cache contention on most processors. Padding is
   * overkill for most Atomics because they are usually irregularly
   * scattered in memory and thus don't interfere much with each
   * other. But Atomic objects residing in arrays will tend to be
   * placed adjacent to each other, and so will most often share
   * cache lines (with a huge negative performance impact) without