* determined experimentally to match our desired probability of false positives.
     */
    // NB: yes, this is surprisingly high, but that's what the experiments said was necessary
    // Raising this number slows the worst-case contains behavior, speeds up hashFloodingDetected,
    // and reduces the false-positive probability.
    static final int MAX_RUN_MULTIPLIER = 13;

    /**

  /**
   * This is a less carefully-controlled version of {@link #testRemovalNotification_clear} - this is
   * a black-box test that tries to create lots of different thread-interleavings, and asserts that
   * each computation is affected by a call to {@code clear()} (and therefore gets passed to the

  /**
   * This is a less carefully-controlled version of {@link #testRemovalNotification_clear} - this is
   * a black-box test that tries to create lots of different thread-interleavings, and asserts that
   * each computation is affected by a call to {@code clear()} (and therefore gets passed to the

      }
    }
  }

  /*
   * This next part consists of several sample classes that provide
   * demonstrations of conditions that cause NullPointerTester
   * to succeed/fail.
   */

  /** Lots of well-behaved methods. */
  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // used by reflection
  private static class PassObject extends SomeClassThatDoesNotUseNullable {
    @Keep
    public static void doThrow(Object arg) {

      int hash = element.hashCode();
      for (int j = Hashing.smear(hash); ; j++) {
        int index = j & mask;
        Object value = table[index];
        if (value == null) {
          // Came to an empty slot. Put the element here.
          elements[uniques++] = element;
          table[index] = element;
          hashCode += hash;
          break;
        } else if (value.equals(element)) {
          break;

        // We only ever register ArrayReferences with the queue so this is always safe.
        ArrayReference<? extends L> arrayRef = (ArrayReference<? extends L>) ref;
        // Try to clear out the array slot, n.b. if we fail that is fine, in either case the
        // arrayRef will be out of the array after this step.
        locks.compareAndSet(arrayRef.index, arrayRef, null);
      }
    }

    @Override

          sortedElements[uniques] = sortedElements[i];
          uniques++;
        }
      }
      Arrays.fill(sortedElements, uniques, length, null);
      if (maybeExpand && uniques * 4 > length * 3) {
        // lots of nonduplicated elements, expand the array by 50%
        sortedElements =
            Arrays.copyOf(sortedElements, IntMath.saturatedAdd(length, length / 2 + 1));
      }

    assertThat(hpackReader!!.headerCount).isEqualTo(1)
  }

  /** Header table backing array is initially 8 long, let's ensure it grows.  */
  @Test
  fun dynamicallyGrowsBeyond64Entries() {
    // Lots of headers need more room!
    hpackReader = Hpack.Reader(bytesIn, 16384, 4096)
    bytesIn.writeByte(0x3F) // Dynamic table size update (size = 16384).
    bytesIn.writeByte(0xE1)
    bytesIn.writeByte(0x7F)

import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Test cases for {@link TypeToken}.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Ben Yu
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // lots of failures, possibly some related to bad equals() implementations?
@NullUnmarked
public class TypeTokenTest extends TestCase {

  private abstract static class StringList implements List<String> {}

  static final class Whitespace extends NamedFastMatcher {

    // TABLE is a precomputed hashset of whitespace characters. MULTIPLIER serves as a hash function
    // whose key property is that it maps 25 characters into the 32-slot table without collision.
    // Basically this is an opportunistic fast implementation as opposed to "good code". For most
    // other use-cases, the reduction in readability isn't worth it.
    static final String TABLE =