Eu testei várias ideias nos editores Python mais populares: PyCharm, VS Code, e editores baseados no Jedi.

Pela última <a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools" class="external-link" target="_blank">Pesquisa do Desenvolvedor Python</a>, isso cobre cerca de 80% dos usuários.

I tested several ideas in the most popular Python editors: PyCharm, VS Code, Jedi based editors.

By the last <a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools" class="external-link" target="_blank">Python Developer Survey</a>, that covers about 80% of the users.

J'ai testé plusieurs idées dans les éditeurs Python les plus populaires : PyCharm, VS Code, les éditeurs basés sur Jedi.

D'après la dernière <a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools" class="external-link" target="_blank">Enquête Développeurs Python</a>, cela couvre environ 80% des utilisateurs.

	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("failed to create the webhook: %v", err)
	}

	resultCh := make(chan rest.Result)

	go func() { resultCh <- wh.RestClient.Get().Do(context.TODO()) }()
	select {
	case <-time.After(time.Second * 5):
		t.Errorf("expected request to timeout after %s", requestTimeout)
	case <-resultCh:
	}
}

		t.Errorf("Timed out waiting for response.")
	}
}

func TestWarningWithRequestTimeout(t *testing.T) {
	type result struct {
		err        interface{}
		stackTrace string
	}
	clientDoneCh, resultCh := make(chan struct{}), make(chan result, 1)
	testHandler := http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
		// this will catch recoverable panic like 'Header called after Handler finished'.

 * help:	testregex --man
 * note:	REG_* features are detected by #ifdef; if REG_* are enums
 *		then supply #define REG_foo REG_foo for each enum REG_foo
 *
 *	Glenn Fowler <gsf@research.att.com>
 *	AT&T Research
 *
 * PLEASE: publish your tests so everyone can benefit
 *
 * The following license covers testregex.c and all associated test data.
 *

		}

		if stringsHasPrefixFold(k, ReservedMetadataPrefixLower) {
			// Do not need to send any internal metadata
			// values to client.
			continue
		}

		// https://github.com/google/security-research/security/advisories/GHSA-76wf-9vgp-pj7w
		if equals(k, xhttp.AmzMetaUnencryptedContentLength, xhttp.AmzMetaUnencryptedContentMD5) {
			continue
		}

		var isSet bool

name: down2
A: B2 E2
B1:
B2: C2 F2
C1:
D1:
C2: D2 E2
D2: B2
E2: D2
E1:
F1:
build A:        A B2 C2 D2 E2 F2
downgrade A F1: A B1 C1 D1 E1 F1

# https://research.swtch.com/vgo-mvs#algorithm_4:
# “[D]owngrades are constrained to only downgrade packages, not also upgrade
# them; if an upgrade before downgrade is needed, the user must ask for it
# explicitly.”
#

// In this case, the level encodes into a tile path as the path element
// "data" instead of "-1".
//
// See also https://golang.org/design/25530-sumdb#checksum-database
// and https://research.swtch.com/tlog#tiling_a_log.
type Tile struct {
	H int   // height of tile (1 ≤ H ≤ 30)
	L int   // level in tiling (-1 ≤ L ≤ 63)
	N int64 // number within level (0 ≤ N, unbounded)

## 设计

然后，我又花了一些时间从用户角度（使用 FastAPI 的开发者）设计了开发者 **API**。

同时，我还在最流行的 Python 代码编辑器中测试了很多思路，包括 PyCharm、VS Code、基于 Jedi 的编辑器。

根据最新 <a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/#development-tools" class="external-link" target="_blank">Python 开发者调研报告</a>显示，这几种编辑器覆盖了约 80% 的用户。

也就是说，**FastAPI** 针对差不多 80% 的 Python 开发者使用的编辑器进行了测试，而且其它大多数编辑器的工作方式也与之类似，因此，**FastAPI** 的优势几乎能在所有编辑器上体现。