assertEquals(0, share1.type, "Share 1 raw type should be 0.");
        assertEquals("Remark 1", share1.remark.trim(), "Share 1 remark should be correct.");

        SmbShareInfo share2 = (SmbShareInfo) response.results[1];
        assertEquals("IPC$", share2.getName().trim(), "Share 2 name should be correct.");

        verify(mockResponse, times(1)).getErrorCode();
    }

    @Test
    void testSetMid() {
        long mid = 12345L;
        mockResponse.setMid(mid);

        // Verify that the method was called with the correct argument
        verify(mockResponse, times(1)).setMid(mid);
    }

    @Test
    void testGetMid() {
        long mid = 54321L;
        when(mockResponse.getMid()).thenReturn(mid);

					t.Fatalf("column id primary key should be correct, name: %v, column: %#v", columnType.Name(),
						columnType)
				}
			case "name":
				dataType := DB.Dialector.DataTypeOf(stmt.Schema.LookUpField(columnType.Name()))
				if !strings.Contains(strings.ToUpper(dataType), strings.ToUpper(columnType.DatabaseTypeName())) {
					t.Fatalf("column name type should be correct, name: %v, length: %v, expects: %v, column: %#v",

    void testGetType() {
        assertEquals(SmbConstants.TYPE_FILESYSTEM, fileBothDirectoryInfo.getType());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test getFileIndex returns correct value")
    void testGetFileIndex() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
        // Prepare test data
        byte[] buffer = createValidBuffer("file.txt", "FILE~1.TXT", true);
        int expectedFileIndex = 0x12345678;

The correct place is:

* In the key `content`, that has as value another JSON object (`dict`) that contains:
    * A key with the media type, e.g. `application/json`, that contains as value another JSON object, that contains:
        * A key `schema`, that has as the value the JSON Schema from the model, here's the correct place.

    class ConstantsTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should have correct FLAGS_NAME_LIST_REFERRAL value")
        void testFlagsNameListReferralConstant() {
            assertEquals(0x0002, Trans2GetDfsReferralResponse.FLAGS_NAME_LIST_REFERRAL);
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should have correct FLAGS_TARGET_SET_BOUNDARY value")
        void testFlagsTargetSetBoundaryConstant() {

    private String testPipeName = "\\PIPE\\testpipe";

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() {
        MockitoAnnotations.openMocks(this);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Constructor should initialize with correct values")
    void testConstructor() {
        // Act
        transWaitNamedPipe = new TransWaitNamedPipe(mockConfig, testPipeName);

        // Assert
        assertNotNull(transWaitNamedPipe);

        mockPolicyHandle = mock(SamrPolicyHandle.class);
        testServer = "testServer";
        testAccess = 0x02000000; // SAM_SERVER_CONNECT access right
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should construct with correct parameters")
    void constructorShouldInitializeFieldsCorrectly() {
        // When
        MsrpcSamrConnect2 msrpcSamrConnect2 = new MsrpcSamrConnect2(testServer, testAccess, mockPolicyHandle);

        // Then

        assertEquals(32, derived1.length, "Derived key should have correct length");
        assertEquals(32, derived2.length, "Derived key should have correct length");
        assertEquals(32, derived3.length, "Derived key should have correct length");

        assertFalse(Arrays.equals(derived1, derived2), "Different labels should produce different keys");

Of course, the attackers would not try all this by hand, they would write a program to do it, possibly with thousands or millions of tests per second. And they would get just one extra correct letter at a time.

But doing that, in some minutes or hours the attackers would have guessed the correct username and password, with the "help" of our application, just using the time taken to answer.

#### Fix it with `secrets.compare_digest()` { #fix-it-with-secrets-compare-digest }