* guaranteed not to throw an exception). If you require specific handling, we recommend
   * implementing your own stats collector.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  public CacheStats plus(CacheStats other) {
    return new CacheStats(
        saturatedAdd(hitCount, other.hitCount),
        saturatedAdd(missCount, other.missCount),
        saturatedAdd(loadSuccessCount, other.loadSuccessCount),

It would take the same amount of time to finish with or without turns (concurrency) and you would have done the same amount of work.

But in this case, if you could bring the 8 ex-cashier/cooks/now-cleaners, and each one of them (plus you) could take a zone of the house to clean it, you could do all the work in **parallel**, with the extra help, and finish much sooner.

   * in <a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2181.txt">RFC 2181</a> part 11 with the fact that the
   * encoding of each part occupies at least two bytes (dot plus label externally, length byte plus
   * label internally). Thus, if all labels have the minimum size of one byte, 127 of them will fit.
   */
  private static final int MAX_PARTS = 127;

  /**

labels.search_result_last_modified	=	Dernière modification :
labels.search_result_favorite	=	Aime
labels.search_result_favorited	=	Aimé
labels.search_click_count	=	Vu ({0})
labels.search_result_more	=	plus..
labels.search_result_cache	=	Cache
labels.search_result_similar	=	Résultats similaires ({0})
labels.facet_label_title	=	Étiqueter
labels.facet_timestamp_title	=	Plage de dates

        .build()

    // Add a bad intermediate CA and have that issue a rogue certificate for localhost. Prepare
    // an SSL context for an attacking webserver. It includes both these rogue certificates plus the
    // trusted good certificate above. The attack is that by including the good certificate in the
    // chain, we may trick the certificate pinner into accepting the rouge certificate.
    val compromisedIntermediateCa =

	}
	if s.Start == nil || s.End == nil {
		return nil
	}
	if *s.Start > *s.End {
		return errors.New("ScanRange: Start cannot be after end")
	}
	return nil
}

// StartLen returns start offset plus length from range.
func (s *ScanRange) StartLen() (start, length int64, err error) {
	if s == nil {
		return 0, -1, nil
	}
	err = s.Validate()
	if err != nil {
		return 0, 0, err
	}

     * known-non-null type? But that particular problem might not arise here, since we're not
     * actually reading from the fields in any case in which they might be null (as proven by the
     * requireNonNull checks below). Plus, we're *already* lying here, since newHeader passes a null
     * key and value, which we pass to the superconstructor, even though the key and value type for

   *   <li>a byte[], short[], or int[], with size a power of two, created by
   *       CompactHashing.createTable, whose values are either
   *       <ul>
   *         <li>UNSET, meaning "null pointer"
   *         <li>one plus an index into the entries and elements array
   *       </ul>
   *   <li>another java.util.Set delegate implementation. In most modern JDKs, normal java.util hash

And, for example, you will probably see that there are multiple processes running the same browser program (Firefox, Chrome, Edge, etc). They normally run one process per tab, plus some other extra processes.

<img class="shadow" src="/img/deployment/concepts/image01.png">

---

Now that we know the difference between the terms **process** and **program**, let's continue talking about deployments.

			t.Error("expected zip64")
		}
	})
}

func testZip64(t testing.TB, size int64) *rleBuffer {
	const chunkSize = 1024
	chunks := int(size / chunkSize)
	// write size bytes plus "END\n" to a zip file
	buf := new(rleBuffer)
	w := NewWriter(buf)
	f, err := w.CreateHeader(&FileHeader{
		Name:   "huge.txt",
		Method: Store,
	})
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatal(err)
	}