public void testPutAllNullValueSingle_unsupported() {
    multimap().putAll(k1(), newArrayList((V) null));
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  // In principle, it would be nice to apply these two tests to keys with existing values, too.

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_PUT, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES)
  public void testPutAllNullValueNullLast_unsupported() {
    int size = getNumElements();

    assertThrows(

will be displayed in the output of a successful install. Existing secret ---------- Instead of having this chart create the secret for you, you can supply a preexisting secret, much like an existing PersistentVolumeClai. First, create the secret: ```bash kubectl create secret generic my-minio-secret --from-literal=rootUser=foobarbaz --from-literal=rootPassword=foobarbazqux ``` Then install the chart, specifying that you want to use an existing secret: ```bash helm install --set existingSecret=my-minio-secret...

will be displayed in the output of a successful install. Existing secret ---------- Instead of having this chart create the secret for you, you can supply a preexisting secret, much like an existing PersistentVolumeClai. First, create the secret: ```bash kubectl create secret generic my-minio-secret --from-literal=rootUser=foobarbaz --from-literal=rootPassword=foobarbazqux ``` Then install the chart, specifying that you want to use an existing secret: ```bash helm install --set existingSecret=my-minio-secret...

        return redirectWith(getClass(), moreUrl("list/" + encodeId(getObjectName(form.path, form.name))));
    }

    /**
     * Displays the form for editing object tags.
     *
     * @param form the tag form containing object information
     * @return HTML response for the tag editing form
     */
    @Execute
    @Secured({ ROLE })
    public HtmlResponse editTags(final TagForm form) {

        existingRule.setRuleId("existing");
        ruleManager.addRule(existingRule);

        // Register at index 0
        testRule.register(0);

        List<Rule> rules = ruleManager.getRules();
        assertEquals(2, rules.size());
        assertEquals("rule1", rules.get(0).getRuleId());
        assertEquals("existing", rules.get(1).getRuleId());
    }

    /**

		expectedErr     error
	}{
		// TestXLStorage case - 1.
		// valid case with existing volume and file to delete.
		{
			srcVol:          "success-vol",
			srcPath:         "abc",
			expectedListDir: []string{"def/", "xyz/"},
			expectedErr:     nil,
		},
		// TestXLStorage case - 1.
		// valid case with existing volume and file to delete.
		{
			srcVol:          "success-vol",

$MAVEN_HOME = "$MAVEN_HOME_PARENT/$MAVEN_HOME_NAME"

if (Test-Path -Path "$MAVEN_HOME" -PathType Container) {
  Write-Verbose "found existing MAVEN_HOME at $MAVEN_HOME"
  Write-Output "MVN_CMD=$MAVEN_HOME/bin/$MVN_CMD"
  exit $?
}

if (! $distributionUrlNameMain -or ($distributionUrlName -eq $distributionUrlNameMain)) {

    }

    /**
     * Stores a character mapping item in the specified dictionary.
     * <p>
     * This method performs either an insert operation (for new items with ID 0)
     * or an update operation (for existing items with non-zero ID) depending on
     * the item's current state.
     * </p>
     *
     * @param dictId the dictionary ID to store the character mapping item in

        }

        valueSources.add(modelValueSource1);

        valueSources.add(new MapBasedValueSource(config.getUserProperties()));

        // Overwrite existing values in model properties. Otherwise, it's not possible
        // to define them via command line e.g.: mvn -Drevision=6.5.7 ...
        versionProcessor.overwriteModelProperties(modelProperties, config);

For example, it was clear that ideally it should be based on standard Python type hints.

Also, the best approach was to use already existing standards.

So, before even starting to code **FastAPI**, I spent several months studying the specs for OpenAPI, JSON Schema, OAuth2, etc. Understanding their relationship, overlap, and differences.

## Design { #design }