}

	newSSHCon := newSSHConnMock("dillon=ldap")
	_, err = sshPubKeyAuth(newSSHCon, testKey)
	if err != nil {
		c.Fatalf("expected no error but got(%s)", err)
	}

	newSSHCon = newSSHConnMock("dillon")
	_, err = sshPubKeyAuth(newSSHCon, testKey)
	if err != nil {
		c.Fatalf("expected no error but got(%s)", err)
	}
}

// A user without an sshpubkey attribute in LDAP (here: fahim) should not be

/**
 * Tests for SmbEndOfFileException focusing on message, status, and throwability.
 */
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
class SmbEndOfFileExceptionTest {

    /**
     * Verifies the no-arg constructor sets the expected message, status, and no cause.
     */
    @Test
    void defaultConstructorSetsMessageAndStatus() {
        // Arrange & Act
        SmbEndOfFileException ex = new SmbEndOfFileException();

        // Assert

      object : SerialTask {
        override fun start() {
          taskRunner.assertLockHeld()
          waitingCoordinatorInterrupted = true
          val coordinatorTask = waitingCoordinatorTask ?: error("no coordinator waiting")
          currentTask = coordinatorTask
          taskRunner.notifyAll()
        }
      }

    // Let the coordinator process its interruption.
    runTasks()
  }

 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>If your answers are:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>(1) "no" and (2) "no", use {@link #forGraph(SuccessorsFunction)}.
 *   <li>(1) "yes" and (2) "yes", use {@link #forTree(SuccessorsFunction)}.
 *   <li>(1) "yes" and (2) "no", you can use either, but {@code forTree()} will be more efficient.
 *   <li>(1) "no" and (2) "yes", <b><i>neither will work</i></b>, but if you transform your node

   and the old credentials had to be removed once the rotation completed. This process is now gone.
   The root credentials can now be changed easily.

> Does this mean I need an enterprise KMS setup to run MinIO (securely)?

No, MinIO does not depend on any third-party KMS provider. You have three options here:

- Run MinIO without a KMS. In this case all IAM data will be stored in plain-text.

    void release_invokedOnce() throws Exception {
        // Arrange: no setup needed; we verify interaction only

        // Act: call release
        handle.release();

        // Assert: verify one invocation and no more
        verify(handle, times(1)).release();
        verifyNoMoreInteractions(handle);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("ensureDFSResolved(): no exception when underlying call succeeds")

 *       necessary there, since we have stopped using the {@code @ParametersAreNonnullByDefault}
 *       annotations that {@code ParametricNullness} was counteracting.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This annotation is a temporary hack. We will remove it after <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1203145963">tools no longer need
 * it</a>.
 */
@GwtCompatible

 *       necessary there, since we have stopped using the {@code @ParametersAreNonnullByDefault}
 *       annotations that {@code ParametricNullness} was counteracting.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This annotation is a temporary hack. We will remove it after <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1203145963">tools no longer need
 * it</a>.
 */
@GwtCompatible

 *       necessary there, since we have stopped using the {@code @ParametersAreNonnullByDefault}
 *       annotations that {@code ParametricNullness} was counteracting.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This annotation is a temporary hack. We will remove it after <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1203145963">tools no longer need
 * it</a>.
 */
@GwtCompatible

      // permitted not to throw because it would be a no-op
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_PUT, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_KEY_QUERIES)
  public void testReplace_absentNullKeyUnsupported() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(null, v3());
    } catch (NullPointerException tolerated) {
      // permitted not to throw because it would be a no-op
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }