}

    /**
     * Redirects an authenticated user to the appropriate admin interface based on their roles.
     * Users with admin roles are redirected to the dashboard, while other users are redirected
     * to their designated admin action class or to the root if no specific action is available.
     *
     * @param user the authenticated user bean containing role information

        ndrLong.encode(mockNdrBuffer);

        // Verify that enc_ndr_long was called exactly once with the correct value
        verify(mockNdrBuffer, times(1)).enc_ndr_long(testValue);
        // Verify that no other interactions occurred with the mock buffer
        verifyNoMoreInteractions(mockNdrBuffer);
    }

    @Test
    void decode_shouldCallDecNdrLongAndAssignValue() throws NdrException {
        int decodedValue = 54321;

 *     this.entry = entry;
 *   }
 *
 *   public E getEntry() {
 *     return entry;
 *   }
 *
 *   public int compareTo(FIFOEntry<E> other) {
 *     int res = entry.compareTo(other.entry);
 *     if (res == 0 && other.entry != this.entry) {
 *       res = (seqNum < other.seqNum ? -1 : 1);
 *     }
 *     return res;
 *   }
 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * @author Doug Lea
 * @author Justin T. Sampson

First let's see how editors, mypy and other tools would see this.

`BaseUser` has the base fields. Then `UserIn` inherits from `BaseUser` and adds the `password` field, so, it will include all the fields from both models.

We annotate the function return type as `BaseUser`, but we are actually returning a `UserIn` instance.

For information about plugins and other support for Go in editors and shells,
see this page on the Go Wiki:

 * control the lifecycle of the mojo itself, and to inject other beans.
 * </p>
 * <p>
 * The mojo class can also be injected with an {@link Execute} annotation to specify a
 * forked lifecycle.
 * </p>
 * <p>
 * The {@link Parameter} annotation can be added on fields to inject data
 * from the plugin configuration or from other components.
 * </p>
 * <p>

if !cond {
	*p = 1
}
</pre>

<p>
If <code>cond</code> is false and another goroutine is reading <code>*p</code>,
then in the original program, the other goroutine can only observe any prior value of <code>*p</code> and <code>1</code>.
In the rewritten program, the other goroutine can observe <code>2</code>, which was previously impossible.
</p>

<p>
Not introducing data races also means not assuming that loops terminate.

    public void test_evaluate_withMissingParameter() {
        String template = "Hello ${name} and ${other}";
        Map<String, Object> paramMap = new HashMap<>();
        paramMap.put("name", "Bob");
        // "other" parameter is missing

        Object result = scriptEngine.evaluate(template, paramMap);
        assertEquals("Hello Bob and ${other}", result);
    }

    // Test evaluate method with complex object as parameter

    }
    return tmp;
  }

  @Benchmark
  long parseUnsignedLong(int reps) {
    long tmp = 0;
    // Given that we make three calls per pass, we scale reps down in order
    // to do a comparable amount of work to other measurements.
    int scaledReps = reps / 3 + 1;
    for (int i = 0; i < scaledReps; i++) {
      int j = i & ARRAY_MASK;
      tmp += UnsignedLongs.parseUnsignedLong(decimalStrings[j]);

 * any other implementation of this interface.
 *
 * <p>If you have your own graph implementation based around a custom node type {@code MyNode},
 * which has a method {@code getChildren()} that retrieves its successors in a graph:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, MyNode::getChildren);
 * }
 *