private SmbTransport transport;

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() {
        MockitoAnnotations.openMocks(this);
        // Setup transport fields that are accessed directly
        transport.tconHostName = "testHost";
        // Setup session.transport field (accessed directly in SmbTree)
        session.transport = transport;
        // Setup session to return transport via method call
        when(session.transport()).thenReturn(transport);

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/** Skeleton for a tester of a {@code BiMap}. */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@NullMarked

        // Then
        assertNotNull(dfsRootEnum, "The MsrpcDfsRootEnum object should not be null.");
        // The server name is stored in a protected field without a public getter, so we cannot directly test it.
        // We can test the public fields that are set.
        assertEquals(200, dfsRootEnum.level, "The level should be initialized to 200.");
        assertNotNull(dfsRootEnum.info, "The info struct should not be null.");

import java.util.Collections;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Tests for {@code Multiset.add}.
 *
 * @author Jared Levy
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")

import java.util.List;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Tests {@link List#equals}.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")

First, create a directory for your project.

What I normally do is that I create a directory named `code` inside my home/user directory.

And inside of that I create one directory per project.

<div class="termy">

```console
// Go to the home directory
$ cd
// Create a directory for all your code projects
$ mkdir code
// Enter into that code directory
$ cd code

👆 💪 📣 `Response` 🔢 🔗, & ⚒ 🎚 (& 🍪) 👫.

## 📨 `Response` 🔗

👆 💪 🚮 🎚 🕐❔ 👆 📨 `Response` 🔗.

✍ 📨 🔬 [📨 📨 🔗](response-directly.md){.internal-link target=_blank} & 🚶‍♀️ 🎚 🌖 🔢:

{* ../../docs_src/response_headers/tutorial001.py hl[10:12] *}

/// note | 📡 ℹ

It's optional to use it, but that's where you would put the user's identification, so we are using it here.

JWT might be used for other things apart from identifying a user and allowing them to perform operations directly on your API.

For example, you could identify a "car" or a "blog post".

Then you could add permissions about that entity, like "drive" (for the car) or "edit" (for the blog).

#
# We can't test on the windows toolchains because they're using a legacy
# toolchain format (or something) that specifies the toolchain directly instead
# of as a "repository". They can't be valid on Linux because Linux can't do
# anything with a Windows-only toolchain, and bazel errors if trying to build
# that directory.
@test "bazel nobuild passes on all of TF except TF Lite and win toolchains" {

또한 의존관계에서 `Response` 매개변수를 선언하고, 해당 의존성에서 쿠키(및 헤더)를 설정할 수도 있습니다.

## `Response`를 직접 반환하기

코드에서 `Response`를 직접 반환할 때도 쿠키를 생성할 수 있습니다.

이를 위해 [Response를 직접 반환하기](response-directly.md){.internal-link target=_blank}에서 설명한 대로 응답을 생성할 수 있습니다.

그런 다음 쿠키를 설정하고 반환하면 됩니다:
{* ../../docs_src/response_directly/tutorial002.py hl[1,18] *}
/// tip